2014/06/05 14:41:14 62.849 -149.393 87.4 4.0 Arkansas
USGS Felt map for this earthquake
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2014/06/05 14:41:14:0 62.85 -149.39 87.4 4.0 Arkansas Stations used: AK.CCB AK.DHY AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.HARP AK.HDA AK.KTH AK.MCK AK.PPLA AK.RC01 AK.RIDG AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.TRF AK.WRH AT.PMR IM.IL31 IU.COLA Filtering commands used: cut a -30 a 100 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.02e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 3.94 Z = 89 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 85 90 -10 NP2 175 80 -180 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.02e+22 7 130 N 0.00e+00 80 265 P -1.02e+22 7 40 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -1.75e+21 Mxy -9.92e+21 Mxz -1.77e+21 Myy 1.75e+21 Myz 1.55e+20 Mzz 1.55e+14 #####--------- #########------------ ###########------------- P - ############------------- -- ##############-------------------- ###############--------------------- ################---------------------- #################----------------------- #################----------------------- ##################------------------------ ##################--------------########## ##########---------####################### -------------------####################### ------------------###################### ------------------###################### -----------------##################### -----------------############### # ----------------############### T ---------------############## --------------############## ------------########## --------###### Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 1.55e+14 -1.77e+21 -1.55e+20 -1.77e+21 -1.75e+21 9.92e+21 -1.55e+20 9.92e+21 1.75e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20140605144114/index.html |
STK = 85 DIP = 90 RAKE = -10 MW = 3.94 HS = 89.0
The NDK file is 20140605144114.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2014/06/05 14:41:14:0 62.85 -149.39 87.4 4.0 Arkansas Stations used: AK.CCB AK.DHY AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.HARP AK.HDA AK.KTH AK.MCK AK.PPLA AK.RC01 AK.RIDG AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.TRF AK.WRH AT.PMR IM.IL31 IU.COLA Filtering commands used: cut a -30 a 100 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.02e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 3.94 Z = 89 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 85 90 -10 NP2 175 80 -180 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.02e+22 7 130 N 0.00e+00 80 265 P -1.02e+22 7 40 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -1.75e+21 Mxy -9.92e+21 Mxz -1.77e+21 Myy 1.75e+21 Myz 1.55e+20 Mzz 1.55e+14 #####--------- #########------------ ###########------------- P - ############------------- -- ##############-------------------- ###############--------------------- ################---------------------- #################----------------------- #################----------------------- ##################------------------------ ##################--------------########## ##########---------####################### -------------------####################### ------------------###################### ------------------###################### -----------------##################### -----------------############### # ----------------############### T ---------------############## --------------############## ------------########## --------###### Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 1.55e+14 -1.77e+21 -1.55e+20 -1.77e+21 -1.75e+21 9.92e+21 -1.55e+20 9.92e+21 1.75e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20140605144114/index.html |
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut a -30 a 100 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 2.0 -5 80 -5 3.16 0.3248 WVFGRD96 4.0 -5 80 -5 3.24 0.3712 WVFGRD96 6.0 355 80 -15 3.30 0.3856 WVFGRD96 8.0 355 75 -15 3.35 0.3935 WVFGRD96 9.0 265 85 -5 3.36 0.4051 WVFGRD96 10.0 265 90 -5 3.38 0.4164 WVFGRD96 12.0 85 90 5 3.42 0.4303 WVFGRD96 14.0 85 90 5 3.44 0.4387 WVFGRD96 16.0 85 90 0 3.47 0.4466 WVFGRD96 18.0 85 90 0 3.49 0.4532 WVFGRD96 19.0 265 85 -5 3.50 0.4592 WVFGRD96 20.0 265 85 -5 3.51 0.4639 WVFGRD96 22.0 265 75 5 3.53 0.4743 WVFGRD96 24.0 265 75 5 3.55 0.4856 WVFGRD96 26.0 265 75 5 3.56 0.4952 WVFGRD96 28.0 265 75 5 3.58 0.5025 WVFGRD96 29.0 265 80 10 3.59 0.5070 WVFGRD96 30.0 270 80 10 3.60 0.5111 WVFGRD96 32.0 270 80 10 3.62 0.5181 WVFGRD96 34.0 265 80 10 3.64 0.5231 WVFGRD96 36.0 265 80 10 3.66 0.5263 WVFGRD96 38.0 265 90 5 3.70 0.5341 WVFGRD96 39.0 85 85 -5 3.71 0.5419 WVFGRD96 40.0 265 90 5 3.73 0.5458 WVFGRD96 42.0 270 80 10 3.76 0.5428 WVFGRD96 44.0 270 80 10 3.77 0.5431 WVFGRD96 46.0 85 80 -10 3.79 0.5478 WVFGRD96 48.0 85 80 -10 3.80 0.5539 WVFGRD96 49.0 85 80 -10 3.81 0.5575 WVFGRD96 50.0 85 80 -10 3.81 0.5614 WVFGRD96 52.0 85 80 -10 3.83 0.5691 WVFGRD96 54.0 85 80 -10 3.84 0.5770 WVFGRD96 56.0 85 80 -10 3.85 0.5854 WVFGRD96 58.0 85 80 -15 3.86 0.5930 WVFGRD96 59.0 85 85 -10 3.86 0.5962 WVFGRD96 60.0 85 85 -10 3.86 0.6004 WVFGRD96 62.0 85 85 -10 3.87 0.6071 WVFGRD96 64.0 270 90 10 3.88 0.6114 WVFGRD96 66.0 85 85 -10 3.88 0.6190 WVFGRD96 68.0 270 90 10 3.89 0.6226 WVFGRD96 69.0 265 90 10 3.89 0.6246 WVFGRD96 70.0 85 85 -10 3.89 0.6285 WVFGRD96 72.0 85 85 -10 3.90 0.6317 WVFGRD96 74.0 265 90 10 3.91 0.6349 WVFGRD96 76.0 85 90 -10 3.91 0.6378 WVFGRD96 78.0 85 90 -10 3.92 0.6397 WVFGRD96 79.0 85 90 -10 3.92 0.6408 WVFGRD96 80.0 85 90 -10 3.92 0.6422 WVFGRD96 82.0 85 90 -10 3.92 0.6431 WVFGRD96 84.0 85 90 -10 3.93 0.6441 WVFGRD96 86.0 85 90 -10 3.93 0.6451 WVFGRD96 88.0 265 90 10 3.94 0.6453 WVFGRD96 89.0 85 90 -10 3.94 0.6455 WVFGRD96 90.0 265 90 10 3.94 0.6453 WVFGRD96 92.0 85 90 -10 3.95 0.6444 WVFGRD96 94.0 85 90 -10 3.95 0.6439 WVFGRD96 96.0 85 90 -10 3.95 0.6437 WVFGRD96 98.0 85 90 -10 3.96 0.6433 WVFGRD96 99.0 265 85 10 3.96 0.6436 WVFGRD96 100.0 265 85 10 3.97 0.6440 WVFGRD96 102.0 265 85 10 3.97 0.6432 WVFGRD96 104.0 85 90 -10 3.97 0.6399 WVFGRD96 106.0 85 90 -5 3.97 0.6385 WVFGRD96 108.0 85 90 -5 3.97 0.6370 WVFGRD96 109.0 265 85 5 3.98 0.6384 WVFGRD96 110.0 85 90 -5 3.98 0.6353 WVFGRD96 112.0 265 85 5 3.99 0.6358 WVFGRD96 114.0 85 90 -5 3.99 0.6323 WVFGRD96 116.0 85 90 -5 3.99 0.6310 WVFGRD96 118.0 265 85 5 4.00 0.6322 WVFGRD96 119.0 265 85 5 4.00 0.6310
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 89.0 85 90 -10 3.94 0.6455
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut a -30 a 100 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files: