2014/06/05 05:37:59 61.163 -140.245 11.8 4.9 Alaska
USGS Felt map for this earthquake
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2014/06/05 05:37:59:0 61.16 -140.24 11.8 4.9 Alaska Stations used: AK.BAL AK.BARN AK.BESE AK.CCB AK.DHY AK.DOT AK.EYAK AK.FID AK.GHO AK.GLB AK.GLI AK.HARP AK.HDA AK.HIN AK.JIS AK.KNK AK.MCK AK.MDM AK.MESA AK.PIN AK.PPD AK.RAG AK.RC01 AK.RIDG AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.TRF AK.VRDI AK.WAX AK.WRH AK.YAH AT.MENT AT.PMR AT.SIT AT.SKAG AT.YKU2 CN.DAWY CN.HYT CN.WHY IM.IL31 IU.COLA US.EGAK Filtering commands used: cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 4.73e+23 dyne-cm Mw = 5.05 Z = 14 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 70 80 25 NP2 335 65 169 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 4.73e+23 25 295 N 0.00e+00 63 90 P -4.73e+23 10 201 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -3.32e+23 Mxy -3.02e+23 Mxz 1.51e+23 Myy 2.63e+23 Myz -1.34e+23 Mzz 6.84e+22 -------------- #####----------------- ##########------------------ #############----------------- #################----------------- ###################----------------- ### ################---------------- #### T #################---------------# #### ##################-----------#### ###########################-------######## ###########################---############ ##########################--############## #####################--------############# ##############--------------############ ######-----------------------########### ----------------------------########## ---------------------------######### --------------------------######## ------------------------###### ------ --------------##### --- P --------------## ------------ Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 6.84e+22 1.51e+23 1.34e+23 1.51e+23 -3.32e+23 3.02e+23 1.34e+23 3.02e+23 2.63e+23 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20140605053759/index.html |
STK = 70 DIP = 80 RAKE = 25 MW = 5.05 HS = 14.0
The NDK file is 20140605053759.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2014/06/05 05:37:59:0 61.16 -140.24 11.8 4.9 Alaska Stations used: AK.BAL AK.BARN AK.BESE AK.CCB AK.DHY AK.DOT AK.EYAK AK.FID AK.GHO AK.GLB AK.GLI AK.HARP AK.HDA AK.HIN AK.JIS AK.KNK AK.MCK AK.MDM AK.MESA AK.PIN AK.PPD AK.RAG AK.RC01 AK.RIDG AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.TRF AK.VRDI AK.WAX AK.WRH AK.YAH AT.MENT AT.PMR AT.SIT AT.SKAG AT.YKU2 CN.DAWY CN.HYT CN.WHY IM.IL31 IU.COLA US.EGAK Filtering commands used: cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 4.73e+23 dyne-cm Mw = 5.05 Z = 14 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 70 80 25 NP2 335 65 169 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 4.73e+23 25 295 N 0.00e+00 63 90 P -4.73e+23 10 201 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -3.32e+23 Mxy -3.02e+23 Mxz 1.51e+23 Myy 2.63e+23 Myz -1.34e+23 Mzz 6.84e+22 -------------- #####----------------- ##########------------------ #############----------------- #################----------------- ###################----------------- ### ################---------------- #### T #################---------------# #### ##################-----------#### ###########################-------######## ###########################---############ ##########################--############## #####################--------############# ##############--------------############ ######-----------------------########### ----------------------------########## ---------------------------######### --------------------------######## ------------------------###### ------ --------------##### --- P --------------## ------------ Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 6.84e+22 1.51e+23 1.34e+23 1.51e+23 -3.32e+23 3.02e+23 1.34e+23 3.02e+23 2.63e+23 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20140605053759/index.html |
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 245 90 0 4.65 0.2799 WVFGRD96 2.0 65 90 5 4.75 0.3588 WVFGRD96 3.0 65 90 5 4.80 0.3938 WVFGRD96 4.0 245 80 -10 4.84 0.4186 WVFGRD96 5.0 70 75 20 4.88 0.4372 WVFGRD96 6.0 70 75 20 4.91 0.4600 WVFGRD96 7.0 70 80 20 4.93 0.4830 WVFGRD96 8.0 70 75 25 4.97 0.5072 WVFGRD96 9.0 70 80 30 4.99 0.5241 WVFGRD96 10.0 70 80 25 5.00 0.5381 WVFGRD96 11.0 70 80 25 5.02 0.5488 WVFGRD96 12.0 70 80 25 5.03 0.5559 WVFGRD96 13.0 70 80 25 5.04 0.5601 WVFGRD96 14.0 70 80 25 5.05 0.5613 WVFGRD96 15.0 70 80 20 5.06 0.5610 WVFGRD96 16.0 70 80 20 5.07 0.5590 WVFGRD96 17.0 70 80 20 5.08 0.5554 WVFGRD96 18.0 70 80 20 5.08 0.5508 WVFGRD96 19.0 70 85 20 5.09 0.5461 WVFGRD96 20.0 70 85 20 5.10 0.5407 WVFGRD96 21.0 70 85 20 5.11 0.5345 WVFGRD96 22.0 70 85 20 5.11 0.5280 WVFGRD96 23.0 65 90 25 5.12 0.5215 WVFGRD96 24.0 245 90 -25 5.13 0.5149 WVFGRD96 25.0 65 90 25 5.14 0.5084 WVFGRD96 26.0 65 90 25 5.14 0.5017 WVFGRD96 27.0 245 90 -25 5.15 0.4947 WVFGRD96 28.0 65 90 25 5.16 0.4877 WVFGRD96 29.0 245 90 -25 5.16 0.4805
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 14.0 70 80 25 5.05 0.5613
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files: