2013/09/01 22:52:05 69.202 -144.534 1.9 4.8 Alaska
USGS Felt map for this earthquake
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2013/09/01 22:52:05:0 69.20 -144.53 1.9 4.8 Alaska Stations used: AK.BPAW AK.BWN AK.CCB AK.COLD AK.DOT AK.FYU AK.HDA AK.MCK AK.MDM AK.MLY AK.PPD AK.RIDG AK.SCRK AK.WRH CN.INK IM.IL31 IU.COLA TA.EPYK TA.TCOL TA.TOLK US.EGAK YE.PIC2 Filtering commands used: cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 6.61e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.48 Z = 11 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 120 85 -175 NP2 30 85 -5 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 6.61e+22 0 255 N 0.00e+00 83 165 P -6.61e+22 7 345 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -5.65e+22 Mxy 3.24e+22 Mxz -7.80e+21 Myy 5.75e+22 Myz 2.04e+21 Mzz -1.00e+21 - P ---------- ----- -------------# -----------------------##### ------------------------###### -------------------------######### #------------------------########### ####---------------------############# #######------------------############### ##########--------------################ ##############----------################## #################------################### ####################--#################### #####################--################### #################-------############## T ################-----------########### ##############-----------------###### #############----------------------# ###########----------------------- ########---------------------- #####----------------------- #--------------------- -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.00e+21 -7.80e+21 -2.04e+21 -7.80e+21 -5.65e+22 -3.24e+22 -2.04e+21 -3.24e+22 5.75e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20130901225205/index.html |
STK = 30 DIP = 85 RAKE = -5 MW = 4.48 HS = 11.0
The NDK file is 20130901225205.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2013/09/01 22:52:05:0 69.20 -144.53 1.9 4.8 Alaska Stations used: AK.BPAW AK.BWN AK.CCB AK.COLD AK.DOT AK.FYU AK.HDA AK.MCK AK.MDM AK.MLY AK.PPD AK.RIDG AK.SCRK AK.WRH CN.INK IM.IL31 IU.COLA TA.EPYK TA.TCOL TA.TOLK US.EGAK YE.PIC2 Filtering commands used: cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 6.61e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.48 Z = 11 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 120 85 -175 NP2 30 85 -5 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 6.61e+22 0 255 N 0.00e+00 83 165 P -6.61e+22 7 345 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -5.65e+22 Mxy 3.24e+22 Mxz -7.80e+21 Myy 5.75e+22 Myz 2.04e+21 Mzz -1.00e+21 - P ---------- ----- -------------# -----------------------##### ------------------------###### -------------------------######### #------------------------########### ####---------------------############# #######------------------############### ##########--------------################ ##############----------################## #################------################### ####################--#################### #####################--################### #################-------############## T ################-----------########### ##############-----------------###### #############----------------------# ###########----------------------- ########---------------------- #####----------------------- #--------------------- -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.00e+21 -7.80e+21 -2.04e+21 -7.80e+21 -5.65e+22 -3.24e+22 -2.04e+21 -3.24e+22 5.75e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20130901225205/index.html |
aUSGS/SLU Regional Moment Solution 13/09/01 22:52:04.00 Epicenter: 69.179 -144.498 MW 4.5 USGS/SLU REGIONAL MOMENT TENSOR Depth 11 No. of sta: 46 Moment Tensor; Scale 10**15 Nm Mrr=-0.30 Mtt=-6.28 Mpp= 6.58 Mrt=-0.77 Mrp= 0.67 Mtp=-3.57 Principal axes: T Val= 7.59 Plg= 6 Azm=255 N -0.34 82 114 P -7.25 5 346 Best Double Couple:Mo=7.4*10**15 NP1:Strike= 31 Dip=82 Slip= 1 NP2: 300 89 172 |
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 0.5 205 75 30 4.17 0.3269 WVFGRD96 1.0 205 75 25 4.18 0.3467 WVFGRD96 2.0 205 70 20 4.25 0.4097 WVFGRD96 3.0 25 70 10 4.28 0.4522 WVFGRD96 4.0 25 80 -5 4.31 0.4915 WVFGRD96 5.0 25 80 -5 4.34 0.5248 WVFGRD96 6.0 25 80 -10 4.37 0.5525 WVFGRD96 7.0 25 80 -10 4.39 0.5760 WVFGRD96 8.0 25 80 -10 4.42 0.5983 WVFGRD96 9.0 25 80 -5 4.44 0.6112 WVFGRD96 10.0 30 80 -5 4.47 0.6184 WVFGRD96 11.0 30 85 -5 4.48 0.6210 WVFGRD96 12.0 25 85 0 4.47 0.6198 WVFGRD96 13.0 25 85 0 4.48 0.6158 WVFGRD96 14.0 25 85 5 4.49 0.6110 WVFGRD96 15.0 25 85 5 4.50 0.6055 WVFGRD96 16.0 25 85 5 4.51 0.5997 WVFGRD96 17.0 25 85 5 4.51 0.5935 WVFGRD96 18.0 25 85 5 4.52 0.5868 WVFGRD96 19.0 25 85 5 4.53 0.5799 WVFGRD96 20.0 25 85 5 4.54 0.5724 WVFGRD96 21.0 25 85 5 4.54 0.5652 WVFGRD96 22.0 25 85 10 4.55 0.5570 WVFGRD96 23.0 25 85 10 4.55 0.5476 WVFGRD96 24.0 25 85 10 4.56 0.5379 WVFGRD96 25.0 25 85 10 4.57 0.5283 WVFGRD96 26.0 25 85 10 4.57 0.5172 WVFGRD96 27.0 25 85 10 4.58 0.5066 WVFGRD96 28.0 25 85 10 4.58 0.4962 WVFGRD96 29.0 205 90 -10 4.59 0.4831
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 11.0 30 85 -5 4.48 0.6210
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files: