Location

2014/10/31 23:00:03 45.16 22.28 2 4.6 Romania

Arrival Times (from USGS)

Felt Map

Focal Mechanism

USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2014/10/31 23:00:03:9 45.16 22.28 2.0 4.6 Romania Stations used: BS.PLD HT.SRS HU.BUD MN.DIVS MN.PDG MN.TIR RO.ARR RO.BZS RO.DEV RO.LOT RO.MLR SJ.BBLS SK.CRVS Filtering commands used: cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 2.04e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.14 Z = 14 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 209 81 -155 NP2 115 65 -10 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 2.04e+22 11 340 N 0.00e+00 63 228 P -2.04e+22 24 75 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.62e+22 Mxy -1.07e+22 Mxz 1.53e+21 Myy -1.35e+22 Myz -8.66e+21 Mzz -2.72e+21 ############ ### T ###############- ###### #############------ #####################--------- ######################------------ ######################-------------- #####################----------------- --###################------------- --- ----################-------------- P --- ------##############--------------- ---- --------###########----------------------- ----------########------------------------ -------------####------------------------- ---------------------------------------- --------------#####--------------------- ------------###########--------------- ----------########################## ---------######################### ------######################## ----######################## -##################### ############## Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -2.72e+21 1.53e+21 8.66e+21 1.53e+21 1.62e+22 1.07e+22 8.66e+21 1.07e+22 -1.35e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.EU/20141031230003/index.html

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion and first motion observations is

      STK = 115
      DIP = 65
     RAKE = -10
       MW = 4.14
       HS = 14.0

The NDK file is 20141031230003.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to others

SLU

USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2014/10/31 23:00:03:9 45.16 22.28 2.0 4.6 Romania Stations used: BS.PLD HT.SRS HU.BUD MN.DIVS MN.PDG MN.TIR RO.ARR RO.BZS RO.DEV RO.LOT RO.MLR SJ.BBLS SK.CRVS Filtering commands used: cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 2.04e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.14 Z = 14 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 209 81 -155 NP2 115 65 -10 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 2.04e+22 11 340 N 0.00e+00 63 228 P -2.04e+22 24 75 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.62e+22 Mxy -1.07e+22 Mxz 1.53e+21 Myy -1.35e+22 Myz -8.66e+21 Mzz -2.72e+21 ############ ### T ###############- ###### #############------ #####################--------- ######################------------ ######################-------------- #####################----------------- --###################------------- --- ----################-------------- P --- ------##############--------------- ---- --------###########----------------------- ----------########------------------------ -------------####------------------------- ---------------------------------------- --------------#####--------------------- ------------###########--------------- ----------########################## ---------######################### ------######################## ----######################## -##################### ############## Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -2.72e+21 1.53e+21 8.66e+21 1.53e+21 1.62e+22 1.07e+22 8.66e+21 1.07e+22 -1.35e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.EU/20141031230003/index.html

Waveform Inversion

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.

Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut a -30 a 180
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.06 n 3

The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    1.0   110    60   -30   3.75 0.3353
WVFGRD96    2.0   110    55   -30   3.88 0.4516
WVFGRD96    3.0   110    60   -20   3.92 0.4715
WVFGRD96    4.0   120    60     5   3.93 0.5056
WVFGRD96    5.0   120    55   -10   3.96 0.5498
WVFGRD96    6.0   120    60   -10   3.98 0.5899
WVFGRD96    7.0   120    60   -15   4.00 0.6260
WVFGRD96    8.0   115    55   -20   4.06 0.6657
WVFGRD96    9.0   115    55   -20   4.07 0.6915
WVFGRD96   10.0   115    60   -15   4.09 0.7092
WVFGRD96   11.0   115    60   -15   4.10 0.7216
WVFGRD96   12.0   115    65   -10   4.12 0.7280
WVFGRD96   13.0   115    65   -10   4.13 0.7331
WVFGRD96   14.0   115    65   -10   4.14 0.7338
WVFGRD96   15.0   115    65   -10   4.14 0.7310
WVFGRD96   16.0   115    70   -10   4.16 0.7272
WVFGRD96   17.0   115    70   -10   4.16 0.7222
WVFGRD96   18.0   115    70   -10   4.17 0.7156
WVFGRD96   19.0   115    70   -10   4.17 0.7077
WVFGRD96   20.0   115    70   -10   4.18 0.6997
WVFGRD96   21.0   115    70   -10   4.19 0.6924
WVFGRD96   22.0   115    70   -10   4.19 0.6840
WVFGRD96   23.0   115    70   -10   4.20 0.6754
WVFGRD96   24.0   310    65     0   4.16 0.6601
WVFGRD96   25.0   310    65     0   4.16 0.6578
WVFGRD96   26.0   315    60     0   4.17 0.6551
WVFGRD96   27.0   315    60     0   4.17 0.6519
WVFGRD96   28.0   315    60     0   4.18 0.6478
WVFGRD96   29.0   310    65     0   4.19 0.6432

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   14.0   115    65   -10   4.14 0.7338

The mechanism correspond to the best fit is

Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut a -30 a 180
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.06 n 3

Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth

Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

The origin time and epicentral distance are incorrect
The velocity model used for the inversion is incorrect
The velocity model used to define the P-arrival time is not the same as the velocity model used for the waveform inversion (assuming that the initial trace alignment is based on the P arrival time)

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Discussion

The Future

Should the national backbone of the USGS Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) be implemented with an interstation separation of 300 km, it is very likely that an earthquake such as this would have been recorded at distances on the order of 100-200 km. This means that the closest station would have information on source depth and mechanism that was lacking here.

Acknowledgements

Dr. Harley Benz, USGS, provided the USGS USNSN digital data. The digital data used in this study were provided by Natural Resources Canada through their AUTODRM site http://www.seismo.nrcan.gc.ca/nwfa/autodrm/autodrm_req_e.php, and IRIS using their BUD interface.

Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint L ouis University, Universityof Memphis, Lamont Doehrty Earth Observatory, Boston College, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.

Velocity Model

The WUS used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00

Quality Control

Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets

The following stations did not have a valid response files:

DATE=Sat Nov 1 17:08:43 CDT 2014

Last Changed 2014/10/31