2009/01/08 12:04:05 41.7670 20.8040 5.0 4.90
USGS Felt map for this earthquake
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
2009/01/08 12:04:05 41.7670 20.8040 5.0 4.90
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 1.40e+23 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.73
Z = 17 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 110 60 -45
NP2 227 52 -141
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.40e+23 5 170
N 0.00e+00 38 263
P -1.40e+23 52 74
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx 1.30e+23
Mxy -3.80e+22
Mxz -2.95e+22
Myy -4.50e+22
Myz -6.33e+22
Mzz -8.55e+22
##############
######################
############################
####################----------
##################----------------
################--------------------
##############------------------------
-############---------------------------
--#########----------------- ---------
----#######------------------ P ----------
------####------------------- ----------
-------#----------------------------------
--------##--------------------------------
------######----------------------------
-----###########------------------------
----################----------------##
---#################################
--################################
##############################
############################
############# ######
######### T ##
Harvard Convention
Moment Tensor:
R T F
-8.55e+22 -2.95e+22 6.33e+22
-2.95e+22 1.30e+23 3.80e+22
6.33e+22 3.80e+22 -4.50e+22
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/Earthquake_Center/MECH.NA/20090108120405/index.html
|
STK = 110
DIP = 60
RAKE = -45
MW = 4.73
HS = 17.0
The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
2009/01/08 12:04:05 41.7670 20.8040 5.0 4.90
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 1.40e+23 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.73
Z = 17 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 110 60 -45
NP2 227 52 -141
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.40e+23 5 170
N 0.00e+00 38 263
P -1.40e+23 52 74
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx 1.30e+23
Mxy -3.80e+22
Mxz -2.95e+22
Myy -4.50e+22
Myz -6.33e+22
Mzz -8.55e+22
##############
######################
############################
####################----------
##################----------------
################--------------------
##############------------------------
-############---------------------------
--#########----------------- ---------
----#######------------------ P ----------
------####------------------- ----------
-------#----------------------------------
--------##--------------------------------
------######----------------------------
-----###########------------------------
----################----------------##
---#################################
--################################
##############################
############################
############# ######
######### T ##
Harvard Convention
Moment Tensor:
R T F
-8.55e+22 -2.95e+22 6.33e+22
-2.95e+22 1.30e+23 3.80e+22
6.33e+22 3.80e+22 -4.50e+22
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/Earthquake_Center/MECH.NA/20090108120405/index.html
|
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.04 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 0.5 135 55 40 4.37 0.4150
WVFGRD96 1.0 140 55 50 4.40 0.4240
WVFGRD96 2.0 135 60 40 4.48 0.4946
WVFGRD96 3.0 135 60 45 4.52 0.4956
WVFGRD96 4.0 130 65 40 4.54 0.4745
WVFGRD96 5.0 110 70 -45 4.60 0.4921
WVFGRD96 6.0 110 70 -45 4.62 0.5452
WVFGRD96 7.0 110 65 -45 4.63 0.6109
WVFGRD96 8.0 115 75 -55 4.67 0.6302
WVFGRD96 9.0 110 70 -55 4.70 0.6879
WVFGRD96 10.0 105 60 -50 4.72 0.7423
WVFGRD96 11.0 105 60 -50 4.73 0.7874
WVFGRD96 12.0 105 60 -50 4.73 0.8202
WVFGRD96 13.0 105 60 -50 4.73 0.8442
WVFGRD96 14.0 105 60 -50 4.74 0.8600
WVFGRD96 15.0 110 60 -45 4.73 0.8705
WVFGRD96 16.0 110 60 -45 4.73 0.8775
WVFGRD96 17.0 110 60 -45 4.73 0.8802
WVFGRD96 18.0 110 60 -45 4.74 0.8797
WVFGRD96 19.0 110 60 -45 4.74 0.8767
WVFGRD96 20.0 115 65 -40 4.73 0.8735
WVFGRD96 21.0 115 65 -40 4.74 0.8699
WVFGRD96 22.0 115 65 -40 4.74 0.8642
WVFGRD96 23.0 115 65 -40 4.74 0.8572
WVFGRD96 24.0 115 65 -40 4.74 0.8490
WVFGRD96 25.0 115 65 -40 4.74 0.8400
WVFGRD96 26.0 120 70 -40 4.74 0.8308
WVFGRD96 27.0 120 70 -35 4.74 0.8222
WVFGRD96 28.0 120 70 -35 4.75 0.8135
WVFGRD96 29.0 120 70 -35 4.75 0.8043
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 17.0 110 60 -45 4.73 0.8802
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted componnet is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. The number in black at the rightr of each predicted traces it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.04 n 3
|
|
|
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
Should the national backbone of the USGS Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) be implemented with an interstation separation of 300 km, it is very likely that an earthquake such as this would have been recorded at distances on the order of 100-200 km. This means that the closest station would have information on source depth and mechanism that was lacking here.
Dr. Harley Benz, USGS, provided the USGS USNSN digital data. The digital data used in this study were provided by Natural Resources Canada through their AUTODRM site http://www.seismo.nrcan.gc.ca/nwfa/autodrm/autodrm_req_e.php, and IRIS using their BUD interface.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint L ouis University, Universityof Memphis, Lamont Doehrty Earth Observatory, Boston College, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files:
DATE=Thu Jan 8 09:21:18 MST 2009