2010/09/06 12:21:27 -43.5290 171.8858 9.0 4.60
USGS Felt map for this earthquake
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2010/09/06 12:21:27:0 -43.53 171.89 9.0 4.6
Stations used:
NZ.CRLZ NZ.DSZ NZ.FOZ NZ.JCZ NZ.KHZ NZ.LBZ NZ.LTZ NZ.MQZ
NZ.NNZ NZ.ODZ NZ.OXZ NZ.QRZ NZ.RPZ NZ.THZ NZ.WVZ
Filtering commands used:
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.0625 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 1.55e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.06
Z = 9 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 61 54 110
NP2 210 40 65
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.55e+22 72 23
N 0.00e+00 16 230
P -1.55e+22 7 138
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -7.10e+21
Mxy 8.09e+21
Mxz 5.56e+21
Myy -6.72e+21
Myz 3.96e+20
Mzz 1.38e+22
--------------
---------------#######
-------------###############
-----------###################
-----------#######################
----------##########################
----------###########################-
---------########### ##############---
--------############ T ##############---
---------############ #############-----
--------############################------
-------###########################--------
-------#########################----------
------#######################-----------
------#####################-------------
-----#################----------------
----#############-------------------
####------------------------- --
##------------------------- P
##------------------------
----------------------
--------------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
1.38e+22 5.56e+21 -3.96e+20
5.56e+21 -7.10e+21 -8.09e+21
-3.96e+20 -8.09e+21 -6.72e+21
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/Earthquake_Center/MECH.NA/20100906122127/index.html
|
STK = 210
DIP = 40
RAKE = 65
MW = 4.06
HS = 9.0
The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2010/09/06 12:21:27:0 -43.53 171.89 9.0 4.6
Stations used:
NZ.CRLZ NZ.DSZ NZ.FOZ NZ.JCZ NZ.KHZ NZ.LBZ NZ.LTZ NZ.MQZ
NZ.NNZ NZ.ODZ NZ.OXZ NZ.QRZ NZ.RPZ NZ.THZ NZ.WVZ
Filtering commands used:
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.0625 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 1.55e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.06
Z = 9 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 61 54 110
NP2 210 40 65
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.55e+22 72 23
N 0.00e+00 16 230
P -1.55e+22 7 138
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -7.10e+21
Mxy 8.09e+21
Mxz 5.56e+21
Myy -6.72e+21
Myz 3.96e+20
Mzz 1.38e+22
--------------
---------------#######
-------------###############
-----------###################
-----------#######################
----------##########################
----------###########################-
---------########### ##############---
--------############ T ##############---
---------############ #############-----
--------############################------
-------###########################--------
-------#########################----------
------#######################-----------
------#####################-------------
-----#################----------------
----#############-------------------
####------------------------- --
##------------------------- P
##------------------------
----------------------
--------------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
1.38e+22 5.56e+21 -3.96e+20
5.56e+21 -7.10e+21 -8.09e+21
-3.96e+20 -8.09e+21 -6.72e+21
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/Earthquake_Center/MECH.NA/20100906122127/index.html
|
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.0625 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 0.5 350 60 -60 3.73 0.3015
WVFGRD96 1.0 350 55 -55 3.75 0.3003
WVFGRD96 2.0 5 90 60 3.88 0.3142
WVFGRD96 3.0 185 90 -60 3.91 0.3590
WVFGRD96 4.0 10 85 60 3.94 0.4019
WVFGRD96 5.0 15 75 60 3.96 0.4372
WVFGRD96 6.0 220 30 75 4.05 0.4786
WVFGRD96 7.0 215 35 70 4.05 0.5227
WVFGRD96 8.0 210 40 65 4.05 0.5464
WVFGRD96 9.0 210 40 65 4.06 0.5547
WVFGRD96 10.0 205 40 55 4.05 0.5526
WVFGRD96 11.0 200 45 50 4.05 0.5461
WVFGRD96 12.0 190 50 35 4.05 0.5382
WVFGRD96 13.0 190 50 35 4.06 0.5283
WVFGRD96 14.0 190 55 35 4.06 0.5156
WVFGRD96 15.0 195 50 40 4.12 0.5212
WVFGRD96 16.0 195 50 40 4.12 0.5066
WVFGRD96 17.0 190 55 30 4.12 0.4919
WVFGRD96 18.0 190 55 30 4.13 0.4792
WVFGRD96 19.0 190 55 30 4.13 0.4657
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 9.0 210 40 65 4.06 0.5547
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted componnet is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. The number in black at the rightr of each predicted traces it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.0625 n 3
|
|
|
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
Should the national backbone of the USGS Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) be implemented with an interstation separation of 300 km, it is very likely that an earthquake such as this would have been recorded at distances on the order of 100-200 km. This means that the closest station would have information on source depth and mechanism that was lacking here.
Dr. Harley Benz, USGS, provided the USGS USNSN digital data. The digital data used in this study were provided by Natural Resources Canada through their AUTODRM site http://www.seismo.nrcan.gc.ca/nwfa/autodrm/autodrm_req_e.php, and IRIS using their BUD interface.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint L ouis University, Universityof Memphis, Lamont Doehrty Earth Observatory, Boston College, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The SINZ used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01
Model after 10 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.0000 3.6847 2.1276 2.2699 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
1.0000 4.1157 2.3761 2.3392 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
1.0000 4.6393 2.6788 2.4192 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
1.0000 5.0569 2.9193 2.5054 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
1.0000 5.3165 3.0698 2.5563 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
1.0000 5.4790 3.1631 2.5918 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
9.0000 5.6403 3.2569 2.6306 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
10.0000 6.4196 3.7068 2.8208 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
7.0000 6.5607 3.7873 2.8619 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
10.0000 6.6870 3.9106 2.9088 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files:
DATE=Thu Jul 28 16:29:59 CDT 2011