USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2018/06/10 00:29:17:0 61.19 -140.48 1.5 3.9 Yukon, Canada Stations used: AK.BARN AK.BCP AK.BESE AK.BMR AK.CTG AK.DIV AK.GLB AK.GLI AK.HIN AK.HMT AK.ISLE AK.KLU AK.KNK AK.LOGN AK.MCAR AK.MESA AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.SSP AK.VRDI AK.WAX AT.MENT AT.SKAG CN.DAWY CN.WHY NY.FARO NY.MAYO TA.J26L TA.J29N TA.K27K TA.K29M TA.L26K TA.L27K TA.L29M TA.M26K TA.M27K TA.M29M TA.M30M TA.M31M TA.N25K TA.N30M TA.N31M TA.N32M TA.O29M TA.O30N TA.P29M TA.P33M US.EGAK Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 7.24e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.84 Z = 9 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 245 75 -25 NP2 342 66 -164 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 7.24e+21 6 295 N 0.00e+00 61 36 P -7.24e+21 28 202 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -3.60e+21 Mxy -4.66e+21 Mxz 3.12e+21 Myy 5.13e+21 Myz 4.20e+20 Mzz -1.53e+21 #------------- #######--------------- ############---------------- ###############--------------- ##################---------------- ##################---------------- T ###################----------###### # ####################--############## #####################----############### ##################---------############### ##############-------------############### ###########-----------------############## #########-------------------############## #####----------------------############# ###-------------------------############ #--------------------------########### --------------------------########## ---------- ------------######### -------- P ------------####### ------- ------------###### ------------------#### -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.53e+21 3.12e+21 -4.20e+20 3.12e+21 -3.60e+21 4.66e+21 -4.20e+20 4.66e+21 5.13e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20180610002917/index.html |
STK = 245 DIP = 75 RAKE = -25 MW = 3.84 HS = 9.0
The NDK file is 20180610002917.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2018/06/10 00:29:17:0 61.19 -140.48 1.5 3.9 Yukon, Canada Stations used: AK.BARN AK.BCP AK.BESE AK.BMR AK.CTG AK.DIV AK.GLB AK.GLI AK.HIN AK.HMT AK.ISLE AK.KLU AK.KNK AK.LOGN AK.MCAR AK.MESA AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.SSP AK.VRDI AK.WAX AT.MENT AT.SKAG CN.DAWY CN.WHY NY.FARO NY.MAYO TA.J26L TA.J29N TA.K27K TA.K29M TA.L26K TA.L27K TA.L29M TA.M26K TA.M27K TA.M29M TA.M30M TA.M31M TA.N25K TA.N30M TA.N31M TA.N32M TA.O29M TA.O30N TA.P29M TA.P33M US.EGAK Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 7.24e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.84 Z = 9 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 245 75 -25 NP2 342 66 -164 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 7.24e+21 6 295 N 0.00e+00 61 36 P -7.24e+21 28 202 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -3.60e+21 Mxy -4.66e+21 Mxz 3.12e+21 Myy 5.13e+21 Myz 4.20e+20 Mzz -1.53e+21 #------------- #######--------------- ############---------------- ###############--------------- ##################---------------- ##################---------------- T ###################----------###### # ####################--############## #####################----############### ##################---------############### ##############-------------############### ###########-----------------############## #########-------------------############## #####----------------------############# ###-------------------------############ #--------------------------########### --------------------------########## ---------- ------------######### -------- P ------------####### ------- ------------###### ------------------#### -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.53e+21 3.12e+21 -4.20e+20 3.12e+21 -3.60e+21 4.66e+21 -4.20e+20 4.66e+21 5.13e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20180610002917/index.html |
(a) mLg computed using the IASPEI formula; (b) mLg residuals ; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 250 75 -20 3.73 0.5864 WVFGRD96 2.0 250 75 -25 3.77 0.6008 WVFGRD96 3.0 245 70 -30 3.80 0.6137 WVFGRD96 4.0 245 70 -30 3.80 0.6272 WVFGRD96 5.0 245 70 -30 3.81 0.6389 WVFGRD96 6.0 245 75 -30 3.82 0.6469 WVFGRD96 7.0 245 75 -25 3.82 0.6524 WVFGRD96 8.0 245 75 -25 3.83 0.6567 WVFGRD96 9.0 245 75 -25 3.84 0.6583 WVFGRD96 10.0 245 75 -25 3.86 0.6571 WVFGRD96 11.0 245 75 -25 3.87 0.6538 WVFGRD96 12.0 245 75 -25 3.88 0.6477 WVFGRD96 13.0 245 75 -25 3.89 0.6397 WVFGRD96 14.0 245 75 -25 3.90 0.6306 WVFGRD96 15.0 245 75 -25 3.91 0.6208 WVFGRD96 16.0 245 75 -25 3.92 0.6097 WVFGRD96 17.0 245 75 -25 3.93 0.5983 WVFGRD96 18.0 245 75 -25 3.93 0.5860 WVFGRD96 19.0 245 75 -25 3.94 0.5750 WVFGRD96 20.0 245 75 -25 3.96 0.5639 WVFGRD96 21.0 245 75 -25 3.97 0.5521 WVFGRD96 22.0 245 75 -25 3.97 0.5412 WVFGRD96 23.0 245 75 -25 3.98 0.5322 WVFGRD96 24.0 245 75 -25 3.99 0.5229 WVFGRD96 25.0 245 75 -25 3.99 0.5137 WVFGRD96 26.0 245 75 -25 4.00 0.5062 WVFGRD96 27.0 245 75 -25 4.01 0.4995 WVFGRD96 28.0 245 75 -25 4.02 0.4927 WVFGRD96 29.0 245 75 -25 4.02 0.4866
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 9.0 245 75 -25 3.84 0.6583
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The CUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01 CUS Model with Q from simple gamma values ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.0000 5.0000 2.8900 2.5000 0.172E-02 0.387E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 9.0000 6.1000 3.5200 2.7300 0.160E-02 0.363E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 10.0000 6.4000 3.7000 2.8200 0.149E-02 0.336E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 20.0000 6.7000 3.8700 2.9020 0.000E-04 0.000E-04 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 8.1500 4.7000 3.3640 0.194E-02 0.431E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files: