USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2017/12/14 05:57:05:0 63.01 -156.05 15.7 3.8 Alaska Stations used: AK.BPAW AK.CAST TA.G18K TA.H18K TA.H19K TA.J17K TA.J18K TA.J19K TA.K15K TA.K17K TA.K20K TA.L16K TA.L18K TA.L19K TA.N17K TA.N18K TA.N19K TA.O18K Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 2.16e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.49 Z = 11 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 65 74 127 NP2 175 40 25 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 2.16e+21 47 14 N 0.00e+00 36 234 P -2.16e+21 20 128 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 2.12e+20 Mxy 1.16e+21 Mxz 1.48e+21 Myy -1.11e+21 Myz -2.89e+20 Mzz 9.00e+20 ---########### -----################# ------###################### ------######################## -------########### ############# -------############ T ############## --------############ ############### --------#############################--- --------###########################----- ---------#########################-------- ---------######################----------- ---------###################-------------- ---------################----------------- --------###########--------------------- ---------######------------------------- ------##----------------------- ---- ########---------------------- P --- ########--------------------- -- #######----------------------- ########-------------------- #######--------------- ######-------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 9.00e+20 1.48e+21 2.89e+20 1.48e+21 2.12e+20 -1.16e+21 2.89e+20 -1.16e+21 -1.11e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20171214055705/index.html |
STK = 175 DIP = 40 RAKE = 25 MW = 3.49 HS = 11.0
The NDK file is 20171214055705.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2017/12/14 05:57:05:0 63.01 -156.05 15.7 3.8 Alaska Stations used: AK.BPAW AK.CAST TA.G18K TA.H18K TA.H19K TA.J17K TA.J18K TA.J19K TA.K15K TA.K17K TA.K20K TA.L16K TA.L18K TA.L19K TA.N17K TA.N18K TA.N19K TA.O18K Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 2.16e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.49 Z = 11 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 65 74 127 NP2 175 40 25 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 2.16e+21 47 14 N 0.00e+00 36 234 P -2.16e+21 20 128 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 2.12e+20 Mxy 1.16e+21 Mxz 1.48e+21 Myy -1.11e+21 Myz -2.89e+20 Mzz 9.00e+20 ---########### -----################# ------###################### ------######################## -------########### ############# -------############ T ############## --------############ ############### --------#############################--- --------###########################----- ---------#########################-------- ---------######################----------- ---------###################-------------- ---------################----------------- --------###########--------------------- ---------######------------------------- ------##----------------------- ---- ########---------------------- P --- ########--------------------- -- #######----------------------- ########-------------------- #######--------------- ######-------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 9.00e+20 1.48e+21 2.89e+20 1.48e+21 2.12e+20 -1.16e+21 2.89e+20 -1.16e+21 -1.11e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20171214055705/index.html |
|
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 170 90 0 2.94 0.2955 WVFGRD96 2.0 170 90 0 3.14 0.5279 WVFGRD96 3.0 165 90 10 3.19 0.6092 WVFGRD96 4.0 165 90 20 3.24 0.6553 WVFGRD96 5.0 170 65 20 3.29 0.6817 WVFGRD96 6.0 170 65 20 3.31 0.6970 WVFGRD96 7.0 170 65 20 3.33 0.7064 WVFGRD96 8.0 175 45 25 3.42 0.7121 WVFGRD96 9.0 175 45 25 3.44 0.7168 WVFGRD96 10.0 175 40 25 3.48 0.7193 WVFGRD96 11.0 175 40 25 3.49 0.7204 WVFGRD96 12.0 170 50 15 3.46 0.7196 WVFGRD96 13.0 170 50 15 3.47 0.7183 WVFGRD96 14.0 170 50 15 3.48 0.7161 WVFGRD96 15.0 170 50 15 3.50 0.7127 WVFGRD96 16.0 170 55 15 3.49 0.7094 WVFGRD96 17.0 170 55 15 3.50 0.7056 WVFGRD96 18.0 170 60 15 3.50 0.7015 WVFGRD96 19.0 170 60 15 3.51 0.6975 WVFGRD96 20.0 170 65 15 3.51 0.6933 WVFGRD96 21.0 170 60 15 3.53 0.6895 WVFGRD96 22.0 350 60 15 3.53 0.6861 WVFGRD96 23.0 350 60 15 3.53 0.6836 WVFGRD96 24.0 350 60 15 3.54 0.6799 WVFGRD96 25.0 350 55 15 3.56 0.6753 WVFGRD96 26.0 350 60 15 3.56 0.6708 WVFGRD96 27.0 350 60 15 3.56 0.6649 WVFGRD96 28.0 350 60 15 3.57 0.6589 WVFGRD96 29.0 350 55 15 3.59 0.6520
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 11.0 175 40 25 3.49 0.7204
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files: