Location

Location ANSS

2017/09/10 12:45:20 42.571 -111.459 5.0 3.4 Idaho

Focal Mechanism

 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2017/09/10 12:45:20:0  42.57 -111.46   5.0 3.4 Idaho
 
 Stations used:
   GS.ID05 GS.ID06 GS.ID07 GS.ID08 IW.REDW US.AHID US.BW06 
   UU.HVU UU.SPU 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.10 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 2.48e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.53 
  Z  = 8 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      152    77   149
   NP2      250    60    15
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   2.48e+21     31     107
    N   0.00e+00     57     312
    P  -2.48e+21     11     204

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx    -1.83e+21
       Mxy    -1.41e+21
       Mxz     1.08e+20
       Myy     1.27e+21
       Myz     1.24e+21
       Mzz     5.57e+20
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     --------------                  
                 #---------------------              
              #####-----------------------           
             ######------------------------          
           #########-------------------------        
          ##########--------------------------       
         ############--------################--      
        #############---########################     
        ############--##########################     
       ##########------##########################    
       #######----------#########################    
       ######------------########################    
       ####---------------##############   ######    
        ##-----------------############# T #####     
        #-------------------############   #####     
         --------------------##################      
          --------------------################       
           ---------------------#############        
             --------------------##########          
              -----   -------------#######           
                 -- P ---------------##              
                      -------------                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  5.57e+20   1.08e+20  -1.24e+21 
  1.08e+20  -1.83e+21   1.41e+21 
 -1.24e+21   1.41e+21   1.27e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20170910124520/index.html
        

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion and first motion observations is

      STK = 250
      DIP = 60
     RAKE = 15
       MW = 3.53
       HS = 8.0

The NDK file is 20170910124520.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to others
SLU
 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2017/09/10 12:45:20:0  42.57 -111.46   5.0 3.4 Idaho
 
 Stations used:
   GS.ID05 GS.ID06 GS.ID07 GS.ID08 IW.REDW US.AHID US.BW06 
   UU.HVU UU.SPU 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.10 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 2.48e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.53 
  Z  = 8 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      152    77   149
   NP2      250    60    15
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   2.48e+21     31     107
    N   0.00e+00     57     312
    P  -2.48e+21     11     204

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx    -1.83e+21
       Mxy    -1.41e+21
       Mxz     1.08e+20
       Myy     1.27e+21
       Myz     1.24e+21
       Mzz     5.57e+20
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     --------------                  
                 #---------------------              
              #####-----------------------           
             ######------------------------          
           #########-------------------------        
          ##########--------------------------       
         ############--------################--      
        #############---########################     
        ############--##########################     
       ##########------##########################    
       #######----------#########################    
       ######------------########################    
       ####---------------##############   ######    
        ##-----------------############# T #####     
        #-------------------############   #####     
         --------------------##################      
          --------------------################       
           ---------------------#############        
             --------------------##########          
              -----   -------------#######           
                 -- P ---------------##              
                      -------------                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  5.57e+20   1.08e+20  -1.24e+21 
  1.08e+20  -1.83e+21   1.41e+21 
 -1.24e+21   1.41e+21   1.27e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20170910124520/index.html
	

Magnitudes

Context

The next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog which are within ± 0.5 degrees of the new event. This comparison is shown in the left panel of the figure. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors).

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    1.0    70    80    10   3.09 0.3753
WVFGRD96    2.0   230    50   -40   3.32 0.5095
WVFGRD96    3.0   240    50   -15   3.35 0.5893
WVFGRD96    4.0   245    55     0   3.38 0.6565
WVFGRD96    5.0   250    60    10   3.41 0.6954
WVFGRD96    6.0   250    65    10   3.44 0.7216
WVFGRD96    7.0   250    65    10   3.48 0.7411
WVFGRD96    8.0   250    60    15   3.53 0.7512
WVFGRD96    9.0   250    65    15   3.55 0.7494
WVFGRD96   10.0   250    70    10   3.57 0.7452
WVFGRD96   11.0   245    70    10   3.58 0.7360
WVFGRD96   12.0   245    70    10   3.60 0.7232
WVFGRD96   13.0   245    70     5   3.61 0.7086
WVFGRD96   14.0   245    70     5   3.62 0.6930
WVFGRD96   15.0   245    70     5   3.63 0.6755
WVFGRD96   16.0   245    70     5   3.64 0.6580
WVFGRD96   17.0    55    70   -55   3.81 0.6472
WVFGRD96   18.0    55    70   -55   3.82 0.6318
WVFGRD96   19.0    55    70   -55   3.83 0.6129
WVFGRD96   20.0    55    70   -55   3.85 0.5948
WVFGRD96   21.0    55    70   -55   3.86 0.5776
WVFGRD96   22.0    60    70   -50   3.87 0.5612
WVFGRD96   23.0    60    70   -50   3.88 0.5425
WVFGRD96   24.0    60    70   -50   3.89 0.5267
WVFGRD96   25.0   245    60    -5   3.69 0.5157
WVFGRD96   26.0   245    60    -5   3.69 0.5076
WVFGRD96   27.0   245    60    -5   3.70 0.5016
WVFGRD96   28.0   240    55   -10   3.69 0.4954
WVFGRD96   29.0   240    55   -10   3.69 0.4939

The best solution is

WVFGRD96    8.0   250    60    15   3.53 0.7512

The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated.
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.

Velocity Model

The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    

Quality Control

Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets

The following stations did not have a valid response files:

Last Changed Sun Sep 10 09:49:16 CDT 2017