USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2017/09/06 07:32:22:0 42.58 -111.43 4.2 3.5 Idaho Stations used: IW.FXWY IW.IMW IW.MOOW IW.REDW TA.H17A TA.K22A US.AHID US.BOZ US.BW06 US.DUG US.ELK US.HLID US.HWUT US.RLMT UU.BGU UU.BSUT UU.CTU UU.HVU UU.MPU UU.NLU UU.SPU UU.SWUT UU.TCU UU.TMU WY.YPP Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 6.53e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.81 Z = 10 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 333 77 -149 NP2 235 60 -15 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 6.53e+21 11 101 N 0.00e+00 57 353 P -6.53e+21 31 198 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -4.15e+21 Mxy -2.56e+21 Mxz 2.50e+21 Myy 5.62e+21 Myz 2.10e+21 Mzz -1.46e+21 -------------- ##-------------------- #######--------------------- ##########-------------------- #############-------------######## ################-----############### ###################################### ################----#################### ##############-------################### ############-----------################### ###########-------------################## #########----------------############# # ########------------------############ T # #####---------------------########### #####----------------------############# ###-----------------------############ #-------------------------########## ----------- -----------######### --------- P ------------###### -------- ------------##### --------------------## -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.46e+21 2.50e+21 -2.10e+21 2.50e+21 -4.15e+21 2.56e+21 -2.10e+21 2.56e+21 5.62e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20170906073222/index.html |
STK = 235 DIP = 60 RAKE = -15 MW = 3.81 HS = 10.0
The NDK file is 20170906073222.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2017/09/06 07:32:22:0 42.58 -111.43 4.2 3.5 Idaho Stations used: IW.FXWY IW.IMW IW.MOOW IW.REDW TA.H17A TA.K22A US.AHID US.BOZ US.BW06 US.DUG US.ELK US.HLID US.HWUT US.RLMT UU.BGU UU.BSUT UU.CTU UU.HVU UU.MPU UU.NLU UU.SPU UU.SWUT UU.TCU UU.TMU WY.YPP Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 6.53e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.81 Z = 10 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 333 77 -149 NP2 235 60 -15 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 6.53e+21 11 101 N 0.00e+00 57 353 P -6.53e+21 31 198 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -4.15e+21 Mxy -2.56e+21 Mxz 2.50e+21 Myy 5.62e+21 Myz 2.10e+21 Mzz -1.46e+21 -------------- ##-------------------- #######--------------------- ##########-------------------- #############-------------######## ################-----############### ###################################### ################----#################### ##############-------################### ############-----------################### ###########-------------################## #########----------------############# # ########------------------############ T # #####---------------------########### #####----------------------############# ###-----------------------############ #-------------------------########## ----------- -----------######### --------- P ------------###### -------- ------------##### --------------------## -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.46e+21 2.50e+21 -2.10e+21 2.50e+21 -4.15e+21 2.56e+21 -2.10e+21 2.56e+21 5.62e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20170906073222/index.html |
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 70 70 15 3.38 0.3803 WVFGRD96 2.0 70 65 20 3.52 0.4750 WVFGRD96 3.0 240 55 -10 3.61 0.5296 WVFGRD96 4.0 235 55 -15 3.65 0.5807 WVFGRD96 5.0 235 55 -15 3.67 0.6191 WVFGRD96 6.0 235 60 -15 3.69 0.6483 WVFGRD96 7.0 235 60 -10 3.71 0.6691 WVFGRD96 8.0 235 60 -15 3.78 0.6943 WVFGRD96 9.0 235 60 -15 3.79 0.7026 WVFGRD96 10.0 235 60 -15 3.81 0.7034 WVFGRD96 11.0 235 65 -15 3.83 0.7011 WVFGRD96 12.0 235 65 -15 3.84 0.6947 WVFGRD96 13.0 235 65 -15 3.86 0.6853 WVFGRD96 14.0 235 65 -15 3.87 0.6725 WVFGRD96 15.0 235 65 -15 3.88 0.6583 WVFGRD96 16.0 235 65 -15 3.89 0.6427 WVFGRD96 17.0 235 65 -15 3.90 0.6251 WVFGRD96 18.0 235 70 -20 3.91 0.6057 WVFGRD96 19.0 230 65 -25 3.91 0.5851 WVFGRD96 20.0 230 65 -25 3.92 0.5676 WVFGRD96 21.0 230 65 -25 3.93 0.5496 WVFGRD96 22.0 230 65 -30 3.94 0.5296 WVFGRD96 23.0 230 65 -30 3.94 0.5124 WVFGRD96 24.0 230 65 -30 3.95 0.4934 WVFGRD96 25.0 230 65 -30 3.95 0.4778 WVFGRD96 26.0 230 65 -30 3.95 0.4604 WVFGRD96 27.0 230 65 -30 3.96 0.4462 WVFGRD96 28.0 225 60 -35 3.96 0.4307 WVFGRD96 29.0 225 60 -35 3.96 0.4189
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 10.0 235 60 -15 3.81 0.7034
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files: