Location
2015/11/19 07:42:12 36.661 -98.461 6.2 4.7 Oklahoma
Arrival Times (from USGS)
Arrival time list
Felt Map
USGS Felt map for this earthquake
USGS Felt reports main page
Focal Mechanism
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2015/11/19 07:42:12:0 36.66 -98.46 6.2 4.7 Oklahoma
Stations used:
GS.KAN01 GS.KAN05 GS.KAN06 GS.KAN08 GS.KAN09 GS.KAN11
GS.KAN12 GS.KAN13 GS.KAN14 GS.KAN16 GS.KAN17 GS.KS20
GS.KS21 GS.OK029 GS.OK031 N4.N35B N4.P38B N4.R32B N4.S39B
N4.T35B N4.U38B N4.Z35B N4.Z38B NM.MGMO OK.BCOK OK.CCOK
OK.CHOK OK.CROK OK.FNO OK.GORE OK.LOOK OK.OKCFA OK.RLOK
OK.X37A TA.ABTX TA.BGNE TA.KSCO TA.MSTX TA.T25A TA.TUL1
TA.U40A TA.W39A TA.WHTX US.AMTX US.CBKS US.KSU1 US.MIAR
US.WMOK
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.07 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 1.15e+23 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.64
Z = 9 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 130 85 -10
NP2 221 80 -175
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.15e+23 3 176
N 0.00e+00 79 284
P -1.15e+23 11 85
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx 1.13e+23
Mxy -1.79e+22
Mxz -8.71e+21
Myy -1.09e+23
Myz -2.02e+22
Mzz -3.46e+21
##############
######################
############################
##########################----
--#######################---------
-----###################------------
--------###############---------------
-----------###########------------------
-------------########-------------------
----------------####------------------ -
-------------------------------------- P -
-----------------###------------------ -
---------------#######--------------------
-------------###########----------------
------------##############--------------
---------##################-----------
-------######################-------
-----##########################---
--############################
############################
########### ########
####### T ####
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-3.46e+21 -8.71e+21 2.02e+22
-8.71e+21 1.13e+23 1.79e+22
2.02e+22 1.79e+22 -1.09e+23
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20151119074212/index.html
|
Preferred Solution
The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion and first motion observations is
STK = 130
DIP = 85
RAKE = -10
MW = 4.64
HS = 9.0
The NDK file is 20151119074212.ndk
The waveform inversion is preferred.
Moment Tensor Comparison
The following compares this source inversion to others
| SLU |
USGSMT |
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2015/11/19 07:42:12:0 36.66 -98.46 6.2 4.7 Oklahoma
Stations used:
GS.KAN01 GS.KAN05 GS.KAN06 GS.KAN08 GS.KAN09 GS.KAN11
GS.KAN12 GS.KAN13 GS.KAN14 GS.KAN16 GS.KAN17 GS.KS20
GS.KS21 GS.OK029 GS.OK031 N4.N35B N4.P38B N4.R32B N4.S39B
N4.T35B N4.U38B N4.Z35B N4.Z38B NM.MGMO OK.BCOK OK.CCOK
OK.CHOK OK.CROK OK.FNO OK.GORE OK.LOOK OK.OKCFA OK.RLOK
OK.X37A TA.ABTX TA.BGNE TA.KSCO TA.MSTX TA.T25A TA.TUL1
TA.U40A TA.W39A TA.WHTX US.AMTX US.CBKS US.KSU1 US.MIAR
US.WMOK
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.07 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 1.15e+23 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.64
Z = 9 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 130 85 -10
NP2 221 80 -175
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.15e+23 3 176
N 0.00e+00 79 284
P -1.15e+23 11 85
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx 1.13e+23
Mxy -1.79e+22
Mxz -8.71e+21
Myy -1.09e+23
Myz -2.02e+22
Mzz -3.46e+21
##############
######################
############################
##########################----
--#######################---------
-----###################------------
--------###############---------------
-----------###########------------------
-------------########-------------------
----------------####------------------ -
-------------------------------------- P -
-----------------###------------------ -
---------------#######--------------------
-------------###########----------------
------------##############--------------
---------##################-----------
-------######################-------
-----##########################---
--############################
############################
########### ########
####### T ####
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-3.46e+21 -8.71e+21 2.02e+22
-8.71e+21 1.13e+23 1.79e+22
2.02e+22 1.79e+22 -1.09e+23
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20151119074212/index.html
|
Regional Moment Tensor (Mwr)
Moment 1.276e+16 N-m
Magnitude 4.67
Depth 10.0 km
Percent DC 79%
Half Duration –
Catalog US (us10003zgz)
Data Source US1
Contributor US1
Nodal Planes
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 126 85 -19
NP2 218 71 -175
Principal Axes
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.341 10 174
N -0.143 70 293
P -1.198 17 81
|
Magnitudes
mLg Magnitude
(a) mLg computed using the IASPEI formula; (b) mLg residuals ; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated.
ML Magnitude
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Context
The next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog which are within ± 0.5 degrees of the new event. This comparison is shown in the left panel of the figure. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors).
Waveform Inversion
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the
and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.07 n 3
The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 130 90 5 4.28 0.3908
WVFGRD96 2.0 310 90 -5 4.40 0.5243
WVFGRD96 3.0 130 90 -5 4.45 0.5799
WVFGRD96 4.0 130 85 -15 4.50 0.6186
WVFGRD96 5.0 130 85 -15 4.53 0.6476
WVFGRD96 6.0 130 85 -10 4.56 0.6686
WVFGRD96 7.0 130 85 -10 4.59 0.6844
WVFGRD96 8.0 130 85 -15 4.62 0.6931
WVFGRD96 9.0 130 85 -10 4.64 0.6945
WVFGRD96 10.0 130 85 -10 4.65 0.6917
WVFGRD96 11.0 130 85 -10 4.67 0.6853
WVFGRD96 12.0 130 85 -10 4.68 0.6759
WVFGRD96 13.0 130 85 -10 4.69 0.6656
WVFGRD96 14.0 130 85 -10 4.70 0.6542
WVFGRD96 15.0 130 85 -10 4.71 0.6425
WVFGRD96 16.0 130 85 -10 4.72 0.6308
WVFGRD96 17.0 130 85 -10 4.73 0.6185
WVFGRD96 18.0 130 85 -10 4.73 0.6061
WVFGRD96 19.0 130 80 -10 4.74 0.5942
WVFGRD96 20.0 130 80 -10 4.75 0.5832
WVFGRD96 21.0 130 80 -10 4.75 0.5725
WVFGRD96 22.0 130 80 -10 4.76 0.5625
WVFGRD96 23.0 130 80 -10 4.77 0.5527
WVFGRD96 24.0 130 80 -10 4.77 0.5436
WVFGRD96 25.0 130 80 -10 4.78 0.5346
WVFGRD96 26.0 130 80 -10 4.78 0.5263
WVFGRD96 27.0 130 80 -10 4.79 0.5194
WVFGRD96 28.0 130 80 -10 4.79 0.5124
WVFGRD96 29.0 125 75 -10 4.80 0.5062
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 9.0 130 85 -10 4.64 0.6945
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
|
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted.
Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect.
A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.07 n 3
|
|
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated.
|
|
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms.
Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.
|
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
- The origin time and epicentral distance are incorrect
- The velocity model used for the inversion is incorrect
- The velocity model used to define the P-arrival time is not the
same as the velocity model used for the waveform inversion
(assuming that the initial trace alignment is based on the
P arrival time)
Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Discussion
Acknowledgements
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
Velocity Model
The WUS model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Quality Control
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files:
Last Changed Mon Dec 7 00:09:17 CST 2015
