2015/04/27 22:22:17 35.944 -97.359 8.4 4.4 Oklahoma
USGS Felt map for this earthquake
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2015/04/27 22:22:17:0 35.94 -97.36 8.4 4.4 Oklahoma Stations used: AG.FCAR AG.LCAR AG.WHAR GS.KAN01 GS.KAN05 GS.KAN09 GS.KAN10 GS.KAN11 GS.KAN12 GS.KAN13 GS.KAN14 GS.KAN16 GS.KS20 GS.KS21 GS.OK025 GS.OK030 GS.OK031 GS.OK032 N4.R32B N4.S39B N4.T35B N4.U38B N4.Z35B N4.Z38B OK.BCOK OK.CROK OK.KAY1 OK.OKCFA OK.QUOK OK.U32A OK.X37A TA.ABTX TA.U40A TA.W39A TA.WHTX TA.X40A US.CBKS US.KSU1 US.MIAR US.WMOK Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.60e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.07 Z = 4 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 115 85 -10 NP2 206 80 -175 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.60e+22 3 161 N 0.00e+00 79 269 P -1.60e+22 11 70 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.24e+22 Mxy -9.93e+21 Mxz -1.90e+21 Myy -1.20e+22 Myz -2.41e+21 Mzz -4.83e+20 ############## ###################--- ####################-------- ####################---------- #####################------------- #####################--------------- -####################-------------- -----###############---------------- P - --------###########----------------- - ------------########---------------------- ----------------###----------------------- ------------------##---------------------- -----------------#######------------------ ---------------############------------- --------------##################-------- -------------#######################-- -----------######################### ---------######################### -------####################### -----####################### --############## ### ############ T Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -4.83e+20 -1.90e+21 2.41e+21 -1.90e+21 1.24e+22 9.93e+21 2.41e+21 9.93e+21 -1.20e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20150427222217/index.html |
STK = 115 DIP = 85 RAKE = -10 MW = 4.07 HS = 4.0
The NDK file is 20150427222217.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2015/04/27 22:22:17:0 35.94 -97.36 8.4 4.4 Oklahoma Stations used: AG.FCAR AG.LCAR AG.WHAR GS.KAN01 GS.KAN05 GS.KAN09 GS.KAN10 GS.KAN11 GS.KAN12 GS.KAN13 GS.KAN14 GS.KAN16 GS.KS20 GS.KS21 GS.OK025 GS.OK030 GS.OK031 GS.OK032 N4.R32B N4.S39B N4.T35B N4.U38B N4.Z35B N4.Z38B OK.BCOK OK.CROK OK.KAY1 OK.OKCFA OK.QUOK OK.U32A OK.X37A TA.ABTX TA.U40A TA.W39A TA.WHTX TA.X40A US.CBKS US.KSU1 US.MIAR US.WMOK Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.60e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.07 Z = 4 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 115 85 -10 NP2 206 80 -175 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.60e+22 3 161 N 0.00e+00 79 269 P -1.60e+22 11 70 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.24e+22 Mxy -9.93e+21 Mxz -1.90e+21 Myy -1.20e+22 Myz -2.41e+21 Mzz -4.83e+20 ############## ###################--- ####################-------- ####################---------- #####################------------- #####################--------------- -####################-------------- -----###############---------------- P - --------###########----------------- - ------------########---------------------- ----------------###----------------------- ------------------##---------------------- -----------------#######------------------ ---------------############------------- --------------##################-------- -------------#######################-- -----------######################### ---------######################### -------####################### -----####################### --############## ### ############ T Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -4.83e+20 -1.90e+21 2.41e+21 -1.90e+21 1.24e+22 9.93e+21 2.41e+21 9.93e+21 -1.20e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20150427222217/index.html |
(a) mLg computed using the IASPEI formula; (b) mLg residuals ; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 115 85 0 3.88 0.4726 WVFGRD96 2.0 115 90 -10 3.99 0.5669 WVFGRD96 3.0 115 90 0 4.03 0.5968 WVFGRD96 4.0 115 85 -10 4.07 0.5983 WVFGRD96 5.0 115 85 -10 4.10 0.5878 WVFGRD96 6.0 115 75 5 4.12 0.5727 WVFGRD96 7.0 115 70 5 4.14 0.5631 WVFGRD96 8.0 115 60 5 4.18 0.5544 WVFGRD96 9.0 115 60 5 4.19 0.5402 WVFGRD96 10.0 115 60 5 4.20 0.5268 WVFGRD96 11.0 120 60 10 4.21 0.5153 WVFGRD96 12.0 120 60 15 4.22 0.5058 WVFGRD96 13.0 120 60 10 4.23 0.4963 WVFGRD96 14.0 120 65 10 4.23 0.4888 WVFGRD96 15.0 120 65 10 4.24 0.4812 WVFGRD96 16.0 120 65 10 4.25 0.4739 WVFGRD96 17.0 120 65 10 4.25 0.4664 WVFGRD96 18.0 120 65 15 4.26 0.4590 WVFGRD96 19.0 120 65 15 4.26 0.4519 WVFGRD96 20.0 300 70 20 4.27 0.4433 WVFGRD96 21.0 300 70 20 4.28 0.4378 WVFGRD96 22.0 300 70 20 4.29 0.4325 WVFGRD96 23.0 300 70 20 4.29 0.4273 WVFGRD96 24.0 300 70 20 4.30 0.4223 WVFGRD96 25.0 300 70 20 4.30 0.4175 WVFGRD96 26.0 300 70 20 4.31 0.4125 WVFGRD96 27.0 120 65 10 4.30 0.4085 WVFGRD96 28.0 120 65 10 4.30 0.4052 WVFGRD96 29.0 120 65 10 4.31 0.4027
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 4.0 115 85 -10 4.07 0.5983
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files: