Location
2014/03/05 03:13:19 62.084 -149.462 38.7 4.4 Alaska
Arrival Times (from USGS)
Arrival time list
Felt Map
USGS Felt map for this earthquake
USGS Felt reports main page
Focal Mechanism
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2014/03/05 03:13:19:0 62.08 -149.46 38.7 4.4 Alaska
Stations used:
AK.BPAW AK.CCB AK.CRQ AK.DHY AK.FID AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.KNK
AK.KTH AK.RIDG AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.SSN AK.TGL
AK.TRF AK.WRH IU.COLA US.EGAK
Filtering commands used:
cut a -30 a 140
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 4.07e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.34
Z = 52 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 200 65 -75
NP2 348 29 -119
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 4.07e+22 19 279
N 0.00e+00 14 14
P -4.07e+22 67 137
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -2.62e+21
Mxy -2.37e+21
Mxz 1.28e+22
Myy 3.28e+22
Myz -2.22e+22
Mzz -3.01e+22
#######-------
######################
################-----#######
###############---------######
################------------######
################--------------######
################----------------######
################------------------######
## ##########-------------------######
### T #########---------------------######
### #########---------------------######
##############----------------------######
##############---------- ---------######
############----------- P ---------#####
############----------- ---------#####
###########----------------------#####
#########----------------------#####
########----------------------####
#######--------------------###
######------------------####
###----------------###
-------------#
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-3.01e+22 1.28e+22 2.22e+22
1.28e+22 -2.62e+21 2.37e+21
2.22e+22 2.37e+21 3.28e+22
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20140305031319/index.html
|
Preferred Solution
The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion and first motion observations is
STK = 200
DIP = 65
RAKE = -75
MW = 4.34
HS = 52.0
The NDK file is 20140305031319.ndk
The waveform inversion is preferred.
Moment Tensor Comparison
The following compares this source inversion to others
| SLU |
USGSMT |
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2014/03/05 03:13:19:0 62.08 -149.46 38.7 4.4 Alaska
Stations used:
AK.BPAW AK.CCB AK.CRQ AK.DHY AK.FID AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.KNK
AK.KTH AK.RIDG AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.SSN AK.TGL
AK.TRF AK.WRH IU.COLA US.EGAK
Filtering commands used:
cut a -30 a 140
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 4.07e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.34
Z = 52 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 200 65 -75
NP2 348 29 -119
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 4.07e+22 19 279
N 0.00e+00 14 14
P -4.07e+22 67 137
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -2.62e+21
Mxy -2.37e+21
Mxz 1.28e+22
Myy 3.28e+22
Myz -2.22e+22
Mzz -3.01e+22
#######-------
######################
################-----#######
###############---------######
################------------######
################--------------######
################----------------######
################------------------######
## ##########-------------------######
### T #########---------------------######
### #########---------------------######
##############----------------------######
##############---------- ---------######
############----------- P ---------#####
############----------- ---------#####
###########----------------------#####
#########----------------------#####
########----------------------####
#######--------------------###
######------------------####
###----------------###
-------------#
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-3.01e+22 1.28e+22 2.22e+22
1.28e+22 -2.62e+21 2.37e+21
2.22e+22 2.37e+21 3.28e+22
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20140305031319/index.html
|
Moment 4.08e+15 N-m
Magnitude 4.3
Percent DC 97%
Depth 51.0 km
Updated 2014-03-05 03:27:44 UTC
Author us
Catalog ak
Contributor us
Code us_b000n1bg_mwr
Principal Axes
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 4.058 17 276
N 0.046 15 10
P -4.104 67 140
Nodal Planes
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 198 64 -73
NP2 344 31 -120
|
|
Magnitudes
ML Magnitude
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Context
The next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog which are within ± 0.5 degrees of the new event. This comparison is shown in the left panel of the figure. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors).
Waveform Inversion
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the
and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut a -30 a 140
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 2.0 20 40 -85 3.68 0.2842
WVFGRD96 4.0 75 65 -5 3.71 0.2775
WVFGRD96 6.0 75 65 15 3.76 0.3019
WVFGRD96 8.0 65 85 45 3.80 0.3381
WVFGRD96 10.0 65 80 45 3.82 0.3794
WVFGRD96 12.0 60 75 45 3.84 0.4146
WVFGRD96 14.0 55 75 45 3.87 0.4456
WVFGRD96 16.0 55 75 45 3.88 0.4698
WVFGRD96 18.0 55 75 40 3.91 0.4899
WVFGRD96 20.0 220 75 -45 3.92 0.5140
WVFGRD96 22.0 215 70 -45 3.96 0.5346
WVFGRD96 24.0 215 70 -45 3.98 0.5548
WVFGRD96 26.0 215 70 -45 4.00 0.5742
WVFGRD96 28.0 215 70 -45 4.02 0.5917
WVFGRD96 30.0 210 65 -50 4.04 0.6114
WVFGRD96 32.0 210 65 -55 4.06 0.6313
WVFGRD96 34.0 210 65 -55 4.08 0.6468
WVFGRD96 36.0 205 60 -60 4.11 0.6575
WVFGRD96 38.0 205 60 -60 4.13 0.6641
WVFGRD96 40.0 205 60 -70 4.24 0.6820
WVFGRD96 42.0 195 65 -80 4.26 0.6950
WVFGRD96 44.0 195 60 -80 4.28 0.7064
WVFGRD96 46.0 195 65 -80 4.29 0.7153
WVFGRD96 48.0 195 65 -80 4.31 0.7218
WVFGRD96 50.0 200 65 -75 4.32 0.7258
WVFGRD96 52.0 200 65 -75 4.34 0.7267
WVFGRD96 54.0 200 65 -70 4.35 0.7244
WVFGRD96 56.0 200 65 -70 4.36 0.7191
WVFGRD96 58.0 200 65 -70 4.37 0.7106
WVFGRD96 60.0 200 65 -70 4.38 0.6988
WVFGRD96 62.0 200 70 -70 4.38 0.6868
WVFGRD96 64.0 200 70 -70 4.39 0.6748
WVFGRD96 66.0 200 70 -70 4.39 0.6625
WVFGRD96 68.0 200 70 -70 4.40 0.6493
WVFGRD96 70.0 205 75 -65 4.40 0.6345
WVFGRD96 72.0 195 75 -80 4.40 0.6244
WVFGRD96 74.0 200 80 -75 4.40 0.6163
WVFGRD96 76.0 200 80 -75 4.41 0.6125
WVFGRD96 78.0 200 80 -75 4.41 0.6070
WVFGRD96 80.0 200 80 -75 4.42 0.6001
WVFGRD96 82.0 200 80 -75 4.42 0.5911
WVFGRD96 84.0 200 85 -75 4.42 0.5863
WVFGRD96 86.0 200 85 -75 4.43 0.5810
WVFGRD96 88.0 200 85 -75 4.43 0.5741
WVFGRD96 90.0 200 85 -75 4.43 0.5666
WVFGRD96 92.0 200 85 -75 4.43 0.5577
WVFGRD96 94.0 20 90 75 4.43 0.5488
WVFGRD96 96.0 20 90 70 4.44 0.5429
WVFGRD96 98.0 200 90 -70 4.44 0.5369
WVFGRD96 100.0 200 90 -70 4.44 0.5294
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 52.0 200 65 -75 4.34 0.7267
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
|
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted.
Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect.
A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut a -30 a 140
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
|
|
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated.
|
|
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms.
Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.
|
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
- The origin time and epicentral distance are incorrect
- The velocity model used for the inversion is incorrect
- The velocity model used to define the P-arrival time is not the
same as the velocity model used for the waveform inversion
(assuming that the initial trace alignment is based on the
P arrival time)
Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Discussion
Acknowledgements
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
Velocity Model
The WUS model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Quality Control
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files:
Last Changed Mon Dec 7 00:10:04 CST 2015
