Location

2013/12/10 16:35:38 63.158 -151.520 8.8 3.8 Alaska

Arrival Times (from USGS)

Arrival time list

Felt Map

USGS Felt map for this earthquake

USGS Felt reports main page

Focal Mechanism

 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2013/12/10 16:35:38:0  63.16 -151.52   8.8 3.8 Alaska
 
 Stations used:
   AK.BWN AK.CCB AK.CHUM AK.CRQ AK.DHY AK.DOT AK.EYAK AK.FID 
   AK.GHO AK.HIN AK.KIAG AK.KNK AK.KTH AK.MCK AK.PAX AK.PPD 
   AK.PPLA AK.PTPK AK.PWL AK.RC01 AK.RIDG AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM 
   AK.SCRK AK.SKN AK.SSN AK.SWD AK.TGL AK.TRF AK.WAT1 AK.WAT2 
   AK.WAT3 AK.WAT4 AK.WAT5 AK.WAT6 AK.WAT7 AK.WRH AT.MENT 
   AT.PMR AT.SVW2 AT.TTA IU.COLA TA.HDA TA.POKR TA.TCOL 
   US.EGAK YE.PIC1 YE.PIC2 YE.PIC3 YE.PIC4 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut a -30 a 180
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.02 n 3 
   lp c 0.10 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 3.76e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.65 
  Z  = 14 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      180    65    65
   NP2       48    35   132
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   3.76e+21     62      51
    N   0.00e+00     23     191
    P  -3.76e+21     16     288

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx    -2.52e+14
       Mxy     1.44e+21
       Mxz     6.71e+20
       Myy    -2.61e+21
       Myz     2.19e+21
       Mzz     2.61e+21
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     ------########                  
                 ---------#############              
              -----------#################           
             -----------###################          
           ------------#####################-        
          -------------######################-       
         -   ---------#######################--      
        -- P ---------##########   ##########---     
        --   ---------########## T ##########---     
       ---------------##########   ##########----    
       ---------------######################-----    
       ---------------#####################------    
       ---------------#####################------    
        --------------####################------     
        --------------##################--------     
         -------------#################--------      
          -------------##############---------       
           ------------############----------        
             -----------########-----------          
              ###--------#----------------           
                 #########-------------              
                     ######--------                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  2.61e+21   6.71e+20  -2.19e+21 
  6.71e+20  -2.52e+14  -1.44e+21 
 -2.19e+21  -1.44e+21  -2.61e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20131210163538/index.html
        

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion and first motion observations is

      STK = 180
      DIP = 65
     RAKE = 65
       MW = 3.65
       HS = 14.0

The NDK file is 20131210163538.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to others
SLU
 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2013/12/10 16:35:38:0  63.16 -151.52   8.8 3.8 Alaska
 
 Stations used:
   AK.BWN AK.CCB AK.CHUM AK.CRQ AK.DHY AK.DOT AK.EYAK AK.FID 
   AK.GHO AK.HIN AK.KIAG AK.KNK AK.KTH AK.MCK AK.PAX AK.PPD 
   AK.PPLA AK.PTPK AK.PWL AK.RC01 AK.RIDG AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM 
   AK.SCRK AK.SKN AK.SSN AK.SWD AK.TGL AK.TRF AK.WAT1 AK.WAT2 
   AK.WAT3 AK.WAT4 AK.WAT5 AK.WAT6 AK.WAT7 AK.WRH AT.MENT 
   AT.PMR AT.SVW2 AT.TTA IU.COLA TA.HDA TA.POKR TA.TCOL 
   US.EGAK YE.PIC1 YE.PIC2 YE.PIC3 YE.PIC4 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut a -30 a 180
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.02 n 3 
   lp c 0.10 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 3.76e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.65 
  Z  = 14 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      180    65    65
   NP2       48    35   132
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   3.76e+21     62      51
    N   0.00e+00     23     191
    P  -3.76e+21     16     288

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx    -2.52e+14
       Mxy     1.44e+21
       Mxz     6.71e+20
       Myy    -2.61e+21
       Myz     2.19e+21
       Mzz     2.61e+21
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     ------########                  
                 ---------#############              
              -----------#################           
             -----------###################          
           ------------#####################-        
          -------------######################-       
         -   ---------#######################--      
        -- P ---------##########   ##########---     
        --   ---------########## T ##########---     
       ---------------##########   ##########----    
       ---------------######################-----    
       ---------------#####################------    
       ---------------#####################------    
        --------------####################------     
        --------------##################--------     
         -------------#################--------      
          -------------##############---------       
           ------------############----------        
             -----------########-----------          
              ###--------#----------------           
                 #########-------------              
                     ######--------                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  2.61e+21   6.71e+20  -2.19e+21 
  6.71e+20  -2.52e+14  -1.44e+21 
 -2.19e+21  -1.44e+21  -2.61e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20131210163538/index.html
	

Magnitudes

ML Magnitude


(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.


(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.

Context

The next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog which are within ± 0.5 degrees of the new event. This comparison is shown in the left panel of the figure. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors).

Waveform Inversion

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut a -30 a 180
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    1.0   355    50    90   3.21 0.2172
WVFGRD96    2.0   180    40    95   3.36 0.2814
WVFGRD96    3.0   160    80   -50   3.37 0.2216
WVFGRD96    4.0   340    90   -60   3.39 0.2563
WVFGRD96    5.0   340    90   -65   3.41 0.3100
WVFGRD96    6.0   170    80    65   3.43 0.3583
WVFGRD96    7.0   170    80    65   3.45 0.3951
WVFGRD96    8.0   175    80    70   3.53 0.4200
WVFGRD96    9.0   175    75    70   3.55 0.4497
WVFGRD96   10.0   180    70    70   3.58 0.4750
WVFGRD96   11.0   180    70    70   3.59 0.4934
WVFGRD96   12.0   180    65    70   3.62 0.5068
WVFGRD96   13.0   180    65    70   3.63 0.5153
WVFGRD96   14.0   180    65    65   3.65 0.5183
WVFGRD96   15.0   180    65    65   3.66 0.5169
WVFGRD96   16.0   180    65    65   3.67 0.5110
WVFGRD96   17.0   180    65    65   3.68 0.5014
WVFGRD96   18.0   180    65    65   3.69 0.4889
WVFGRD96   19.0   175    70    65   3.69 0.4740
WVFGRD96   20.0   180    70    65   3.70 0.4594
WVFGRD96   21.0   180    70    65   3.72 0.4440
WVFGRD96   22.0   180    70    65   3.72 0.4281
WVFGRD96   23.0   180    70    65   3.73 0.4125
WVFGRD96   24.0   175    75    65   3.73 0.3966
WVFGRD96   25.0   180    70    65   3.74 0.3818
WVFGRD96   26.0   175    70    60   3.74 0.3678
WVFGRD96   27.0   175    70    60   3.75 0.3542
WVFGRD96   28.0   175    70    60   3.75 0.3412
WVFGRD96   29.0   175    70    60   3.75 0.3283

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   14.0   180    65    65   3.65 0.5183

The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut a -30 a 180
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated.
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.

Velocity Model

The WUS model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    

Quality Control

Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets

The following stations did not have a valid response files:

Last Changed Mon Dec 7 00:23:53 CST 2015