Location

2013/01/20 22:03:03 63.301 -151.343 10.8 4.30 Alaska

Arrival Times (from USGS)

Arrival time list

Felt Map

USGS Felt map for this earthquake

USGS Felt reports main page

Focal Mechanism

 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2013/01/20 22:03:03:0  63.30 -151.34  10.8 4.3 Alaska
 
 Stations used:
   AK.BAL AK.BMR AK.CAST AK.COLD AK.DHY AK.DIV AK.GHO AK.GLI 
   AK.HDA AK.KLU AK.KNK AK.MCK AK.MDM AK.MLY AK.NEA AK.PAX 
   AK.PPD AK.RIDG AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.SSN AK.TRF 
   AK.WRH AT.PMR IU.COLA US.EGAK 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   hp c 0.02 n 3
   lp c 0.07 n 3
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 1.78e+22 dyne-cm
  Mw = 4.10 
  Z  = 17 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1       25    80    25
   NP2      290    65   169
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   1.78e+22     25     250
    N   0.00e+00     63      45
    P  -1.78e+22     10     156

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx    -1.26e+22
       Mxy     1.12e+22
       Mxz     4.48e+20
       Myy     1.00e+22
       Myz    -7.58e+21
       Mzz     2.57e+21
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     --------------                  
                 --------------------##              
              ----------------------######           
             -----------------------#######          
           ------------------------##########        
          -------------------------###########       
         ----#######--------------#############      
        ####################------##############     
        ########################################     
       #########################-----############    
       ########################---------#########    
       #######################------------#######    
       #######################--------------#####    
        ####   ##############-----------------##     
        #### T #############-------------------#     
         ###   ############--------------------      
          ################--------------------       
           #############---------------------        
             ##########--------------------          
              ########------------   -----           
                 ###-------------- P --              
                     -------------                   
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  2.57e+21   4.48e+20   7.58e+21 
  4.48e+20  -1.26e+22  -1.12e+22 
  7.58e+21  -1.12e+22   1.00e+22 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20130120220303/index.html
        

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion and first motion observations is

      STK = 25
      DIP = 80
     RAKE = 25
       MW = 4.10
       HS = 17.0

The NDK file is 20130120220303.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to others
SLU
 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2013/01/20 22:03:03:0  63.30 -151.34  10.8 4.3 Alaska
 
 Stations used:
   AK.BAL AK.BMR AK.CAST AK.COLD AK.DHY AK.DIV AK.GHO AK.GLI 
   AK.HDA AK.KLU AK.KNK AK.MCK AK.MDM AK.MLY AK.NEA AK.PAX 
   AK.PPD AK.RIDG AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.SSN AK.TRF 
   AK.WRH AT.PMR IU.COLA US.EGAK 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   hp c 0.02 n 3
   lp c 0.07 n 3
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 1.78e+22 dyne-cm
  Mw = 4.10 
  Z  = 17 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1       25    80    25
   NP2      290    65   169
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   1.78e+22     25     250
    N   0.00e+00     63      45
    P  -1.78e+22     10     156

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx    -1.26e+22
       Mxy     1.12e+22
       Mxz     4.48e+20
       Myy     1.00e+22
       Myz    -7.58e+21
       Mzz     2.57e+21
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     --------------                  
                 --------------------##              
              ----------------------######           
             -----------------------#######          
           ------------------------##########        
          -------------------------###########       
         ----#######--------------#############      
        ####################------##############     
        ########################################     
       #########################-----############    
       ########################---------#########    
       #######################------------#######    
       #######################--------------#####    
        ####   ##############-----------------##     
        #### T #############-------------------#     
         ###   ############--------------------      
          ################--------------------       
           #############---------------------        
             ##########--------------------          
              ########------------   -----           
                 ###-------------- P --              
                     -------------                   
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  2.57e+21   4.48e+20   7.58e+21 
  4.48e+20  -1.26e+22  -1.12e+22 
  7.58e+21  -1.12e+22   1.00e+22 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20130120220303/index.html
	

Magnitudes

ML Magnitude


(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.


(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.

Context

The next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog which are within ± 0.5 degrees of the new event. This comparison is shown in the left panel of the figure. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors).

Waveform Inversion

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.07 n 3
The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    0.5   205    70   -25   3.59 0.2554
WVFGRD96    1.0    30    80   -10   3.61 0.2755
WVFGRD96    2.0   205    70   -20   3.74 0.3640
WVFGRD96    3.0   210    75    -5   3.78 0.3907
WVFGRD96    4.0    30    80    40   3.87 0.4176
WVFGRD96    5.0    30    80    40   3.89 0.4589
WVFGRD96    6.0    30    75    35   3.91 0.4983
WVFGRD96    7.0    30    75    35   3.93 0.5311
WVFGRD96    8.0    30    75    35   3.99 0.5611
WVFGRD96    9.0    30    75    35   4.00 0.5863
WVFGRD96   10.0    30    75    35   4.02 0.6091
WVFGRD96   11.0    30    75    30   4.03 0.6272
WVFGRD96   12.0    30    75    30   4.05 0.6427
WVFGRD96   13.0    30    75    30   4.06 0.6542
WVFGRD96   14.0    25    80    25   4.07 0.6625
WVFGRD96   15.0    25    80    25   4.08 0.6679
WVFGRD96   16.0    25    80    25   4.09 0.6698
WVFGRD96   17.0    25    80    25   4.10 0.6698
WVFGRD96   18.0    25    80    25   4.11 0.6675
WVFGRD96   19.0    25    80    25   4.12 0.6623
WVFGRD96   20.0    25    80    25   4.13 0.6560
WVFGRD96   21.0    25    80    25   4.14 0.6483
WVFGRD96   22.0    25    80    25   4.15 0.6385
WVFGRD96   23.0    25    80    25   4.16 0.6282
WVFGRD96   24.0    25    80    25   4.16 0.6159
WVFGRD96   25.0    25    80    25   4.17 0.6035
WVFGRD96   26.0    25    80    25   4.18 0.5899
WVFGRD96   27.0    30    75    30   4.18 0.5754
WVFGRD96   28.0    30    75    30   4.19 0.5610
WVFGRD96   29.0    30    80    30   4.19 0.5453

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   17.0    25    80    25   4.10 0.6698

The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.07 n 3
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.

Velocity Model

The WUS model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    

Quality Control

Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets

The following stations did not have a valid response files:

Last Changed Mon Dec 7 00:20:08 CST 2015