Location

2006/02/05 03:25:52 44.74N 111.88W 5. 4.6 Montana

Arrival Times (from USGS)

Arrival time list

Felt Map

USGS Felt map for this earthquake

USGS Felt reports page for Intermountain Western US

Focal Mechanism

 SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 2006/02/05 03:25:52 44.74N 111.88W   5. 4.6 Montana
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
    Mo = 4.95e+22 dyne-cm
    Mw = 4.43 
    Z  = 14 km
     Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
      NP1      264    66   -116
      NP2      135    35   -45
 Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
     T   4.95e+22     17      13
     N   0.00e+00     24     276
     P  -4.95e+22     60     135



 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component  Value
       Mxx     3.66e+22
       Mxy     1.65e+22
       Mxz     2.88e+22
       Myy    -3.63e+21
       Myz    -1.18e+22
       Mzz    -3.29e+22
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     ##########   #                  
                 ############## T #####              
              #################   ########           
             ##############################          
           -#################################        
          --##################################       
         ---###################################      
        ---#####################################     
        ----########------------------------####     
       -----##----------------------------------#    
       ----#-------------------------------------    
       -#####------------------------------------    
       #######-----------------   ---------------    
        #######---------------- P --------------     
        ########---------------   --------------     
         ########------------------------------      
          #########---------------------------       
           ##########------------------------        
             ###########-------------------          
              ###############-----------##           
                 ######################              
                     ##############                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     

 Harvard Convention
 Moment Tensor:
      R          T          F
 -3.29e+22   2.88e+22   1.18e+22 
  2.88e+22   3.66e+22  -1.65e+22 
  1.18e+22  -1.65e+22  -3.63e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/NEW/20060205032552/index.html
        

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the station distribution are given in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Location of broadband stations used to obtain focal mechanism

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion and first motion observations is

      STK = 135
      DIP = 35
     RAKE = -45
       MW = 4.43
       HS = 14

The waveform inversion is preferred. The surface-wave solution agrees.

Waveform Inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

hp c 0.02 3
lp c 0.10 3
br c 0.12 0.2 n 4 p 2
The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    0.5    80    45   -90   4.06 0.4538
WVFGRD96    1.0   260    45   -85   4.10 0.4451
WVFGRD96    2.0   265    40   -80   4.21 0.5420
WVFGRD96    3.0   180    80     5   4.27 0.5284
WVFGRD96    4.0   175    70   -10   4.30 0.5114
WVFGRD96    5.0   160    35   -20   4.32 0.5827
WVFGRD96    6.0   160    35   -20   4.34 0.6651
WVFGRD96    7.0   155    35   -20   4.35 0.7250
WVFGRD96    8.0   150    30   -30   4.40 0.7668
WVFGRD96    9.0   145    30   -35   4.40 0.7978
WVFGRD96   10.0   135    30   -45   4.41 0.8198
WVFGRD96   11.0   130    30   -55   4.43 0.8343
WVFGRD96   12.0   135    35   -45   4.42 0.8432
WVFGRD96   13.0   135    35   -45   4.43 0.8471
WVFGRD96   14.0   135    35   -45   4.44 0.8460
WVFGRD96   15.0   135    40   -40   4.44 0.8430
WVFGRD96   16.0   140    40   -30   4.43 0.8359
WVFGRD96   17.0   140    40   -30   4.44 0.8255
WVFGRD96   18.0   140    40   -30   4.45 0.8111
WVFGRD96   19.0   145    45   -25   4.46 0.7940

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   13.0   135    35   -45   4.43 0.8471

The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted componnet is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. The number in black at the rightr of each predicted traces it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

hp c 0.02 3
lp c 0.10 3
br c 0.12 0.2 n 4 p 2
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for depth of 8 km
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

Surface-Wave Focal Mechanism


  NODAL PLANES 

  
  STK=     254.98
  DIP=      59.99
 RAKE=    -120.00
  
             OR
  
  STK=     124.08
  DIP=      41.41
 RAKE=     -49.12
 
 
DEPTH = 0150 km
 
Mw = 4.44
Best Fit 0.8193 - P-T axis plot gives solutions with FIT greater than FIT90

First motion data

The P-wave first motion data for focal mechanism studies are as follow:

Sta Az(deg)    Dist(km)   First motion
LKWY       99  119 eP
MOOW      140  143 iP_C
LOHW      140  162 iP_C
SNOW      147  168 iP_C
REDW      151  174 iP_C
AHID      164  228 iP_C
HLID      238  241 eP_X
MSO       326  282 eP_X
BW06      139  288 eP_X
HWUT      176  349 eP_X
LAO        62  491 eP_X

Surface-wave analysis

Surface wave analysis was performed using codes from Computer Programs in Seismology, specifically the multiple filter analysis program do_mft and the surface-wave radiation pattern search program srfgrd96.

The velocity model used for the search is a modified Utah model .

Data preparation

Digital data were collected, instrument response removed and traces converted to Z, R an T components. Multiple filter analysis was applied to the Z and T traces to obtain the Rayleigh- and Love-wave spectral amplitudes, respectively. These were input to the search program which examined all depths between 1 and 25 km and all possible mechanisms.
Best mechanism fit as a function of depth. The preferred depth is given above. Lower hemisphere projection

Pressure-tension axis trends. Since the surface-wave spectra search does not distinguish between P and T axes and since there is a 180 ambiguity in strike, all possible P and T axes are plotted. First motion data and waveforms will be used to select the preferred mechanism. The purpose of this plot is to provide an idea of the possible range of solutions. The P and T-axes for all mechanisms with goodness of fit greater than 0.9 FITMAX (above) are plotted here.


Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the Love and Rayleigh wave radiation patterns. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. Because of the symmetry of the spectral amplitude rediation patterns, only strikes from 0-180 degrees are sampled.

Love-wave radiation patterns

Rayleigh-wave radiation patterns

Broadband station distributiuon

Sta Az(deg)    Dist(km)   
LKWY	   99	  119
MOOW	  140	  143
LOHW	  140	  162
SNOW	  147	  168
REDW	  151	  174
AHID	  164	  228
HLID	  238	  241
MSO	  326	  282
BW06	  139	  288
HWUT	  176	  349
LAO	   62	  491
RWWY	  130	  509
WVOR	  247	  603
PHWY	  124	  648
MVU	  182	  693
ISCO	  135	  754
LON	  290	  804
TPH	  213	  864
MNV	  219	  874
HUMO	  259	  924
SDCO	  143	  943
WDC	  246	  988
WUAZ	  177	 1025
DAC	  209	 1057
GSC	  204	 1129
ISA	  211	 1153
SAO	  226	 1197
CBKS	  119	 1204
MWC	  206	 1282
GLA	  192	 1322
TUC	  176	 1383
BAR	  199	 1402
KSU1	  111	 1411
MNTX	  156	 1554
WMOK	  130	 1576
EYMN	   70	 1605
JCT	  142	 1904
SLM	  103	 1919
FVM	  105	 1939
UALR	  117	 1999
SIUC	  104	 2046
SIT	  318	 2127
MPH	  112	 2149
USIN	  102	 2152
OXF	  113	 2228
WVT	  107	 2243
WCI	  100	 2246
PLAL	  110	 2296
LTL	  123	 2428
LRAL	  113	 2505
ERPA	   85	 2583

Waveform comparison for this mechanism

Since the analysis of the surface-wave radiation patterns uses only spectral amplitudes and because the surfave-wave radiation patterns have a 180 degree symmetry, each surface-wave solution consists of four possible focal mechanisms corresponding to the interchange of the P- and T-axes and a roation of the mechanism by 180 degrees. To select one mechanism, P-wave first motion can be used. This was not possible in this case because all the P-wave first motions were emergent ( a feature of the P-wave wave takeoff angle, the station location and the mechanism). The other way to select among the mechanisms is to compute forward synthetics and compare the observed and predicted waveforms.

The velocity model used for the waveform fit is a modified Utah model .

The fits to the waveforms with the given mechanism are show below:

This figure shows the fit to the three components of motion (Z - vertical, R-radial and T - transverse). For each station and component, the observed traces is shown in red and the model predicted trace in blue. The traces represent filtered ground velocity in units of meters/sec (the peak value is printed adjacent to each trace; each pair of traces to plotted to the same scale to emphasize the difference in levels). Both synthetic and observed traces have been filtered using the SAC commands:

hp c 0.02 3
lp c 0.10 3
br c 0.12 0.2 n 8 p 2

Discussion

The Future

Should the national backbone of the USGS Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) be implemented with an interstation separation of 300 km, it is very likely that an earthquake such as this would have been recorded at distances on the order of 100-200 km. This means that the closest station would have information on source depth and mechanism that was lacking here.

Acknowledgements

Dr. Harley Benz, USGS, provided the USGS USNSN digital data.

Appendix A

The figures below show the observed spectral amplitudes (units of cm-sec) at each station and the theoretical predictions as a function of period for the mechanism given above. The modified Utah model earth model was used to define the Green's functions. For each station, the Love and Rayleigh wave spectrail amplitudes are plotted with the same scaling so that one can get a sense fo the effects of the effects of the focal mechanism and depth on the excitation of each.

Quality Control

Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets

The following stations did not have a valid response files:

Last Changed Sun Feb 5 07:16:16 CST 2006