2002/05/15 17:54:48 42.2310 -121.9010 8.1 4.30 Oregon
USGS Felt map for this earthquake
USGS Felt reports page for Pacific Northwest
SLU Moment Tensor Solution
2002/05/15 17:54:48 42.2310 -121.9010 8.1 4.30 Oregon
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 2.19e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.16
Z = 12 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 144 73 115
NP2 265 30 35
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 2.19e+22 55 85
N 0.00e+00 24 316
P -2.19e+22 24 214
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -1.23e+22
Mxy -7.88e+21
Mxz 7.60e+21
Myy 1.47e+21
Myz 1.49e+22
Mzz 1.09e+22
--------------
----------------------
##--------------------------
###-------############--------
######-######################-----
#####--#########################----
####-----##########################---
###--------###########################--
##----------###########################-
##------------############## ##########-
#--------------############# T ###########
#---------------############ ###########
------------------########################
------------------######################
--------------------####################
--------------------##################
---------------------###############
------ -------------############
---- P ---------------########
--- ------------------####
----------------------
--------------
Harvard Convention
Moment Tensor:
R T F
1.09e+22 7.60e+21 -1.49e+22
7.60e+21 -1.23e+22 7.88e+21
-1.49e+22 7.88e+21 1.47e+21
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20020515175448/index.html
|
STK = 265
DIP = 30
RAKE = 35
MW = 4.16
HS = 12.0
The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
SLU Moment Tensor Solution
2002/05/15 17:54:48 42.2310 -121.9010 8.1 4.30 Oregon
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 2.19e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.16
Z = 12 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 144 73 115
NP2 265 30 35
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 2.19e+22 55 85
N 0.00e+00 24 316
P -2.19e+22 24 214
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -1.23e+22
Mxy -7.88e+21
Mxz 7.60e+21
Myy 1.47e+21
Myz 1.49e+22
Mzz 1.09e+22
--------------
----------------------
##--------------------------
###-------############--------
######-######################-----
#####--#########################----
####-----##########################---
###--------###########################--
##----------###########################-
##------------############## ##########-
#--------------############# T ###########
#---------------############ ###########
------------------########################
------------------######################
--------------------####################
--------------------##################
---------------------###############
------ -------------############
---- P ---------------########
--- ------------------####
----------------------
--------------
Harvard Convention
Moment Tensor:
R T F
1.09e+22 7.60e+21 -1.49e+22
7.60e+21 -1.23e+22 7.88e+21
-1.49e+22 7.88e+21 1.47e+21
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20020515175448/index.html
|
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 0.5 160 50 -85 3.88 0.4639
WVFGRD96 1.0 210 60 -60 3.86 0.4643
WVFGRD96 2.0 210 60 -60 3.94 0.4973
WVFGRD96 3.0 215 65 -60 4.00 0.4634
WVFGRD96 4.0 10 80 -65 4.06 0.4300
WVFGRD96 5.0 245 20 0 4.08 0.4840
WVFGRD96 6.0 250 25 5 4.07 0.5237
WVFGRD96 7.0 250 25 5 4.07 0.5497
WVFGRD96 8.0 240 20 -10 4.13 0.5641
WVFGRD96 9.0 250 25 5 4.13 0.5769
WVFGRD96 10.0 255 25 15 4.13 0.5829
WVFGRD96 11.0 260 30 30 4.15 0.5854
WVFGRD96 12.0 265 30 35 4.16 0.5868
WVFGRD96 13.0 265 30 35 4.16 0.5856
WVFGRD96 14.0 265 30 35 4.16 0.5815
WVFGRD96 15.0 270 30 40 4.16 0.5766
WVFGRD96 16.0 270 30 40 4.17 0.5701
WVFGRD96 17.0 270 30 40 4.17 0.5627
WVFGRD96 18.0 270 30 40 4.17 0.5543
WVFGRD96 19.0 270 30 40 4.18 0.5456
WVFGRD96 20.0 270 30 40 4.18 0.5366
WVFGRD96 21.0 275 30 45 4.20 0.5277
WVFGRD96 22.0 275 30 45 4.20 0.5179
WVFGRD96 23.0 275 30 45 4.20 0.5078
WVFGRD96 24.0 275 30 45 4.21 0.4975
WVFGRD96 25.0 275 30 45 4.21 0.4868
WVFGRD96 26.0 285 25 55 4.22 0.4758
WVFGRD96 27.0 285 25 55 4.23 0.4647
WVFGRD96 28.0 285 25 55 4.23 0.4533
WVFGRD96 29.0 285 25 55 4.23 0.4414
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 12.0 265 30 35 4.16 0.5868
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted componnet is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. The number in black at the rightr of each predicted traces it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3
|
|
|
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
Should the national backbone of the USGS Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) be implemented with an interstation separation of 300 km, it is very likely that an earthquake such as this would have been recorded at distances on the order of 100-200 km. This means that the closest station would have information on source depth and mechanism that was lacking here.
Dr. Harley Benz, USGS, provided the USGS USNSN digital data. The digital data used in this study were provided by Natural Resources Canada through their AUTODRM site http://www.seismo.nrcan.gc.ca/nwfa/autodrm/autodrm_req_e.php, and IRIS using their BUD interface.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint L ouis University, Universityof Memphis, Lamont Doehrty Earth Observatory, Boston College, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files:
DATE=Wed Dec 17 20:53:08 CST 2008