2015/08/29 18:47:06 46.34 13.67 10 4.0 Slovenia
USGS Felt map for this earthquake
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2015/08/29 18:47:06:0 46.34 13.67 10.0 4.0 Slovenia
Stations used:
CH.ACB CH.AIGLE CH.BALST CH.BERGE CH.BERNI CH.BNALP
CH.BOURR CH.DAGMA CH.DAVOX CH.EMBD CH.EMING CH.EMMET
CH.FIESA CH.FUSIO CH.HASLI CH.LAUCH CH.LIENZ CH.LLS
CH.METMA CH.MTI02 CH.MUGIO CH.MUO CH.NALPS CH.PANIX
CH.PLONS CH.ROMAN CH.ROTHE CH.SENIN CH.SLE CH.SULZ CH.TORNY
CH.VANNI CH.VDL CH.WILA CH.WIMIS CH.WOLEN GE.PSZ GR.UBR
HU.MPLH HU.SOP IV.BRMO IV.CTI IV.PTCC MN.BLY MN.DIVS MN.PDG
NI.ACOM NI.AGOR NI.CGRP NI.CIMO NI.CLUD NI.MPRI NI.SABO
NI.VARN NI.ZOU2 OE.ABTA OE.ARSA OE.CSNA OE.DAVA OE.FETA
OE.KBA OE.MOA OE.MYKA OE.OBKA OE.RETA OE.SOKA OE.WTTA
SI.LUSI SJ.BBLS SJ.FRGS SL.BOJS SL.CEY SL.CRES SL.CRNS
SL.DOBS SL.GBAS SL.GCIS SL.GORS SL.GROS SL.KOGS SL.LJU
SL.MOZS SL.PERS SL.SKDS SL.VISS SL.VNDS SL.VOJS
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 1.50e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.05
Z = 10 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 80 70 65
NP2 314 32 139
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.50e+22 58 316
N 0.00e+00 23 89
P -1.50e+22 21 189
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -1.05e+22
Mxy -4.09e+21
Mxz 9.85e+21
Myy 1.77e+21
Myz -3.93e+21
Mzz 8.72e+21
--------------
----------------------
--#############-------------
####################----------
#########################---------
############################--------
############ ################-------
############# T #################-------
############# ##################------
####################################-----#
#####################################-####
###################################--#####
###############################-------####
--#####################--------------###
-------------------------------------###
------------------------------------##
-----------------------------------#
---------------------------------#
----------- ----------------
---------- P ---------------
------- ------------
--------------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
8.72e+21 9.85e+21 3.93e+21
9.85e+21 -1.05e+22 4.09e+21
3.93e+21 4.09e+21 1.77e+21
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.EU/20150829184706/index.html
|
STK = 80
DIP = 70
RAKE = 65
MW = 4.05
HS = 10.0
The NDK file is 20150829184706.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2015/08/29 18:47:06:0 46.34 13.67 10.0 4.0 Slovenia
Stations used:
CH.ACB CH.AIGLE CH.BALST CH.BERGE CH.BERNI CH.BNALP
CH.BOURR CH.DAGMA CH.DAVOX CH.EMBD CH.EMING CH.EMMET
CH.FIESA CH.FUSIO CH.HASLI CH.LAUCH CH.LIENZ CH.LLS
CH.METMA CH.MTI02 CH.MUGIO CH.MUO CH.NALPS CH.PANIX
CH.PLONS CH.ROMAN CH.ROTHE CH.SENIN CH.SLE CH.SULZ CH.TORNY
CH.VANNI CH.VDL CH.WILA CH.WIMIS CH.WOLEN GE.PSZ GR.UBR
HU.MPLH HU.SOP IV.BRMO IV.CTI IV.PTCC MN.BLY MN.DIVS MN.PDG
NI.ACOM NI.AGOR NI.CGRP NI.CIMO NI.CLUD NI.MPRI NI.SABO
NI.VARN NI.ZOU2 OE.ABTA OE.ARSA OE.CSNA OE.DAVA OE.FETA
OE.KBA OE.MOA OE.MYKA OE.OBKA OE.RETA OE.SOKA OE.WTTA
SI.LUSI SJ.BBLS SJ.FRGS SL.BOJS SL.CEY SL.CRES SL.CRNS
SL.DOBS SL.GBAS SL.GCIS SL.GORS SL.GROS SL.KOGS SL.LJU
SL.MOZS SL.PERS SL.SKDS SL.VISS SL.VNDS SL.VOJS
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 1.50e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.05
Z = 10 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 80 70 65
NP2 314 32 139
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.50e+22 58 316
N 0.00e+00 23 89
P -1.50e+22 21 189
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -1.05e+22
Mxy -4.09e+21
Mxz 9.85e+21
Myy 1.77e+21
Myz -3.93e+21
Mzz 8.72e+21
--------------
----------------------
--#############-------------
####################----------
#########################---------
############################--------
############ ################-------
############# T #################-------
############# ##################------
####################################-----#
#####################################-####
###################################--#####
###############################-------####
--#####################--------------###
-------------------------------------###
------------------------------------##
-----------------------------------#
---------------------------------#
----------- ----------------
---------- P ---------------
------- ------------
--------------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
8.72e+21 9.85e+21 3.93e+21
9.85e+21 -1.05e+22 4.09e+21
3.93e+21 4.09e+21 1.77e+21
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.EU/20150829184706/index.html
|
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 235 45 -75 3.69 0.2631
WVFGRD96 2.0 60 50 -65 3.77 0.2970
WVFGRD96 3.0 70 80 65 3.93 0.3077
WVFGRD96 4.0 70 80 65 3.95 0.3739
WVFGRD96 5.0 75 75 65 3.97 0.4235
WVFGRD96 6.0 75 75 65 3.97 0.4557
WVFGRD96 7.0 80 70 65 3.98 0.4764
WVFGRD96 8.0 75 75 65 4.04 0.4897
WVFGRD96 9.0 80 70 65 4.05 0.4982
WVFGRD96 10.0 80 70 65 4.05 0.4993
WVFGRD96 11.0 75 75 60 4.04 0.4956
WVFGRD96 12.0 75 75 55 4.04 0.4893
WVFGRD96 13.0 75 75 55 4.04 0.4823
WVFGRD96 14.0 70 80 50 4.03 0.4738
WVFGRD96 15.0 70 80 50 4.04 0.4653
WVFGRD96 16.0 65 85 45 4.04 0.4559
WVFGRD96 17.0 65 90 45 4.04 0.4475
WVFGRD96 18.0 245 90 -45 4.04 0.4393
WVFGRD96 19.0 245 85 -45 4.05 0.4311
WVFGRD96 20.0 245 85 -45 4.05 0.4227
WVFGRD96 21.0 245 85 -45 4.06 0.4141
WVFGRD96 22.0 245 85 -45 4.06 0.4057
WVFGRD96 23.0 245 85 -45 4.07 0.3973
WVFGRD96 24.0 245 90 -45 4.07 0.3889
WVFGRD96 25.0 65 90 45 4.08 0.3818
WVFGRD96 26.0 65 90 45 4.08 0.3745
WVFGRD96 27.0 245 90 -45 4.09 0.3673
WVFGRD96 28.0 65 90 40 4.09 0.3600
WVFGRD96 29.0 65 90 40 4.10 0.3528
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 10.0 80 70 65 4.05 0.4993
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3
|
|
|
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Should the national backbone of the USGS Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) be implemented with an interstation separation of 300 km, it is very likely that an earthquake such as this would have been recorded at distances on the order of 100-200 km. This means that the closest station would have information on source depth and mechanism that was lacking here.
Dr. Harley Benz, USGS, provided the USGS USNSN digital data. The digital data used in this study were provided by Natural Resources Canada through their AUTODRM site http://www.seismo.nrcan.gc.ca/nwfa/autodrm/autodrm_req_e.php, and IRIS using their BUD interface.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint L ouis University, Universityof Memphis, Lamont Doehrty Earth Observatory, Boston College, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files:
DATE=Sat Aug 29 21:51:46 CDT 2015